U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Trikalinos TA, Dahabreh IJ, Wong J, et al. Future Research Needs for the Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions with Bypass Graft Surgery in Nonacute Coronary Artery Disease: Identification of Future Research Needs from Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 9 [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2010 Sep. (Future Research Needs Papers, No. 1.)

Cover of Future Research Needs for the Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions with Bypass Graft Surgery in Nonacute Coronary Artery Disease

Future Research Needs for the Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions with Bypass Graft Surgery in Nonacute Coronary Artery Disease: Identification of Future Research Needs from Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 9 [Internet].

Show details

Appendix CExcluded Studies

Appendix Table C1List of excluded studies and reasons for exclusion

First authorYear of publicationTitleJournalPMIDReason for exclusion
Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes Study Group2008Baseline characteristics of patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease enrolled in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trialAm Heart J18760137No follow-up information
M. Y. Chan2008Prevalence, predictors, and impact of conservative medical management for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes who have angiographically documented significant coronary diseaseJACC
Cardiovasc
Interv
19463332Not relevant interventions
E. L. Eisenstein2009Long-term clinical and economic analysis of the Endeavor zotarolimus- eluting stent vs. the cypher sirolimus-eluting stent: 3-year results from the ENDEAVOR III trial (Randomized Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).JACC
Cardiovasc
Interv
20129546Not relevant interventions
M. E. Farkouh2008Design of the Future REvascularization Evaluation in patients with Diabetes mellitus: Optimal management of Multivessel disease (FREEDOM) TrialAm Heart J18215589Trial protocol
Y. Y. Liu2009[Comparison between drug eluting stent and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in elderly patients]Zhonghua
Xin Xue
Guan Bing
Za Zhi
20128370Not English
J. L. Martin2009Frequency of coronary artery bypass grafting following implantation of a paclitaxel-eluting or a bare-metal stent into a single coronary arteryAm J Cardiol19101222Not relevant interventions
A. C. Pereira2006Clinical judgment and treatment options in stable multivessel coronary artery disease: results from the one-year follow-up of the MASS II (Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study II).J Am Coll Cardiol16949484Results from analyses comparing randomization arms not presented.
D. Poldermans2007A clinical randomized trial to evaluate the safety of a noninvasive approach in high-risk patients undergoing major vascular surgery: the DECREASE-V Pilot StudyJ Am Coll Cardiol17466225Not relevant interventions and population
L. Schwartz2009Baseline coronary angiographic findings in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes trial (BARI 2D)Am J Cardiol19231325No follow-up information
K. T. Stroupe2006Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafts vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for revascularization of high-risk patientsCirculation16966588Cost-effectiveness analysis based on RCT
P. J. Vlaar2008Cardiac death and reinfarction after 1 year in the Thrombus Aspiration during percutaneous coronary intervention in Pcute myocardial infarction Study (TAPAS): a 1-year follow-up studyLancet18539223Not relevant population
H. B. Ward2006Coronary artery bypass grafting is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention in prevention of perioperative myocardial infarctions during subsequent vascular surgery.Ann Thorac Surg16928485CABGPCI comparison was not randomized
R. C. Welsh2010Prior coronary artery bypass graft patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary interventionJACC Cardiovasc Interv20298996Not relevant population
S. Vaina2009Effect of gender differences on early and mid-term clinical outcome after percutaneous or surgical coronary revascularisation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: insights from ARTS I and ARTS IIEuro-Intervention19284072Comparison of outcomes between the arms of a randomized trial (ARTS I) and an observational study (ARTS II)

CABG=coronary artery bypass graft surgery; PCI=percutaneous coronary intervention; PMID=PubMed identification number.

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (1.0M)
  • Disable Glossary Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...