Excluded Studies

Thomas A Trikalinos; Issa J Dahabreh; John Wong; Madhumati Rao

Appendix CExcluded Studies

Publication Details

Appendix Table C1

List of excluded studies and reasons for exclusion.

Publication Details

Copyright

Publisher

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Rockville (MD)

NLM Citation

Trikalinos TA, Dahabreh IJ, Wong J, et al. Future Research Needs for the Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions with Bypass Graft Surgery in Nonacute Coronary Artery Disease: Identification of Future Research Needs from Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 9 [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2010 Sep. (Future Research Needs Papers, No. 1.) Appendix C, Excluded Studies.

Appendix Table C1List of excluded studies and reasons for exclusion

First author	Year of publication	Title	Journal	PMID	Reason for exclusion
Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes Study Group	2008	Baseline characteristics of patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease enrolled in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial	Am Heart J	18760137	No follow-up information
M. Y. Chan	2008	Prevalence, predictors, and impact of conservative medical management for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes who have angiographically documented significant coronary disease	JACC Cardiovasc Interv	19463332	Not relevant interventions
E. L. Eisenstein	2009	Long-term clinical and economic analysis of the Endeavor zotarolimus- eluting stent vs. the cypher sirolimus-eluting stent: 3-year results from the ENDEAVOR III trial (Randomized Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).	JACC Cardiovasc Interv	20129546	Not relevant interventions
M. E. Farkouh	2008	Design of the Future REvascularization Evaluation in patients with Diabetes mellitus: Optimal management of Multivessel disease (FREEDOM) Trial	Am Heart J	18215589	Trial protocol
Y. Y. Liu	2009	[Comparison between drug eluting stent and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in elderly patients]	Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi	20128370	Not English
J. L. Martin	2009	Frequency of coronary artery bypass grafting following implantation of a paclitaxel-eluting or a bare-metal stent into a single coronary artery	Am J Cardiol	19101222	Not relevant interventions
A. C. Pereira	2006	Clinical judgment and treatment options in stable multivessel coronary artery disease: results from the one-year follow-up of the MASS II (Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study II).	J Am Coll Cardiol	16949484	Results from analyses comparing randomization arms not presented.
D. Poldermans	2007	A clinical randomized trial to evaluate the safety of a noninvasive approach in high-risk patients undergoing major vascular surgery: the DECREASE-V Pilot Study	J Am Coll Cardiol	17466225	Not relevant interventions and population
L. Schwartz	2009	Baseline coronary angiographic findings in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes trial (BARI 2D)	Am J Cardiol	19231325	No follow-up information
K. T. Stroupe	2006	Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafts vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for revascularization of high-risk patients	Circulation	16966588	Cost-effectiveness analysis based on RCT
P. J. Vlaar	2008	Cardiac death and reinfarction after 1 year in the Thrombus Aspiration during percutaneous coronary intervention in Pcute myocardial infarction Study (TAPAS): a 1-year follow-up study	Lancet	18539223	Not relevant population
H. B. Ward	2006	Coronary artery bypass grafting is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention in prevention of perioperative myocardial infarctions during subsequent vascular surgery.	Ann Thorac Surg	16928485	CABG – PCI comparison was not randomized
R. C. Welsh	2010	Prior coronary artery bypass graft patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention	JACC Cardiovasc Interv	20298996	Not relevant population
S. Vaina	2009	Effect of gender differences on early and mid-term clinical outcome after percutaneous or surgical coronary revascularisation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: insights from ARTS I and ARTS II	Euro-Intervention	19284072	Comparison of outcomes between the arms of a randomized trial (ARTS I) and an observational study (ARTS II)

: CABG=coronary artery bypass graft surgery; PCI=percutaneous coronary intervention; PMID=PubMed identification number.