U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Display Settings:

Items per page
You searched 8+ million full text articles

Try this search in 34+ million citations and abstracts

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 1 to 20 of 1835

1.
Figure 1

Figure 1. From: Light-Induced Fluorescence-Based Device and Hybrid Mobile App for Oral Hygiene Management at Home: Development and Usability Study.

Oral hygiene monitoring system: (a) light-induced fluorescence device and hybrid mobile app; (b) method for monitoring oral hygiene with the naked eye through a mirror; (c) method for monitoring oral hygiene using smartphone; (d) hybrid mobile app that provides time series oral hygiene information.

Jun-Min Kim, et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct;8(10):e17881.

CitationFull text

2.
Question 8 Figure 8

Question 8 Figure 8. From: Oral hygiene practices in nurseries (0-3 years) in the cities of Pavia and Vigevano.

If oral hygiene routines are followed, when in the day? In 25% of the nurseries oral hygiene routines are followed after every meal; In 65% of the nurseries only after lunch; In 10% no oral hygiene routines are followed.

Marzia Segù, et al. Front Oral Health. 2022;3:991741.

CitationFull text

3.
Figure 1

Figure 1. From: The Effectiveness of a Board Game-Based Oral Hygiene Education Program on Oral Hygiene Knowledge and Plaque Index of Adults with Intellectual Disability: A Pilot Study.

Oral hygiene board game oral hygiene board game named “Dental Monopoly” of people with intellectual disability.

Hsiu-Yueh Liu, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb;18(3):946.

CitationFull text

4.
Figure 2

Figure 2. From: Comparison of foam swabs and toothbrushes as oral hygiene interventions in mechanically ventilated patients: a randomised split mouth study.

(A) Changes in plaque and gingival index (Silness and Löe) for patients 1–8 over a 7-day period using oral hygiene intervention either with a toothbrush (solid line) or foam swab (broken line). (B) Changes in plaque and gingival index (Silness and Löe) for patients 9–17, over a 7-day period using oral hygiene intervention either with a toothbrush (solid line) or foam swab (broken line). (C) Changes in plaque and gingival index (Silness and Löe) for patients 19–28, over a 7-day period using oral hygiene intervention either with a toothbrush (solid line) or foam swab (broken line).

Paola J Marino, et al. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2016;3(1):e000150.

CitationFull text

5.
Figure 1

Figure 1. From: Evaluation of a “Picture Assisted Illustration Reinforcement” (PAIR) System for Oral Hygiene in Children with Autism: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Picture illustrations; (a) correct (do’s) oral hygiene care; (b) incorrect (don’ts) oral hygiene care.

Atrey J. Pai Khot, et al. Children (Basel). 2023 Feb;10(2):369.

CitationFull text

6.

Figure 4. From: Smoking, tooth loss and oral hygiene practices have significant and site-specific impacts on the microbiome of oral mucosal surfaces: a cross-sectional study.

 Impact of tooth brushing frequency (<1, 1 or > 1 per day) and oral hygiene (OHI-S index), on the mucosal microbiome. (a) Alpha diversity values according to daily brushing frequency and oral hygiene. (b) Community structure analysed by NMDS of Bray-Curtis dissimilarity values according to daily brushing frequency and oral hygiene. (c) Bar plot showing relative abundance (%) of the 30 most abundant species according to daily brushing frequency and oral hygiene.

Sheila Galvin, et al. J Oral Microbiol. 2023;15(1):2263971.

CitationFull text

7.
Fig 3

Fig 3. Significant correlations (r-value) between environmental factors and the independent factors of oral hygiene behaviour.. From: Relationship between dental experiences, oral hygiene education and self-reported oral hygiene behaviour.

Significant (p ≤ 0.01) positive (full line) and negative (dotted line) correlations between environmental factors (parental care; negative experiences / feelings at / with dentists currently and during childhood; dental anxiety) and the 4 independent oral hygiene behaviour factors (factor 1 “attitude towards oral hygiene” (including sensations towards and during oral hygiene); factor 2 “attitude towards one’s teeth” (including perception of one’s own teeth); factor 4 “self-inspection of one’s teeth” (including actions for controlling one’s own teeth and the use of professional help). Only those results are presented exceeding the threshold of effect size (r2 > 5%).

Maxi Mueller, et al. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0264306.

CitationFull text

8.
Figure 1.

Figure 1. From: The association between oral hygiene and periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Flow chart of identification and selection of studies. OH, oral hygiene; OHI, Oral Hygiene Index; PI, Plaque Index; PSc, plaque score.

Attawood Lertpimonchai, et al. Int Dent J. 2017 Dec;67(6):332-343.

CitationFull text

9.
Figure 3.

Figure 3. From: Effectiveness of “Safeguard Your Smile,” an oral health literacy intervention, on oral hygiene self-care behaviour among Punjabi immigrants:A randomized controlled trial .

Effects of the SYS intervention on oral hygiene self-care knowledge, oral hygiene self-care behaviour, OHL scores, gingival indices, and plaque indices

Navdeep Kaur, et al. Can J Dent Hyg. 2019 Feb;53(1):23-32.

CitationFull text

10.
Fig 2

Fig 2. Categorization in each group.. From: Relationship between oral hygiene knowledge, source of oral hygiene knowledge and oral hygiene behavior in Japanese university students: A prospective cohort study.

Students with poor oral hygiene behavior at baseline were categorized into improved and non-improved groups.

Daiki Fukuhara, et al. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0236259.

CitationFull text

11.
[Table/Fig-2]:

[Table/Fig-2]:. From: Influence of Media in the Choice of Oral Hygiene Products Used Among the Population of Maduravoyal, Chennai, India.

Oral hygiene method

Anitha Logaranjani, et al. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Oct;9(10):ZC06-ZC08.

CitationFull text

12.
Fig 1

Fig 1. Flowchart.. From: Relationship between oral hygiene knowledge, source of oral hygiene knowledge and oral hygiene behavior in Japanese university students: A prospective cohort study.

Students with poor oral hygiene behavior at baseline were classified into respective groups. Each group was analyzed at follow-up.

Daiki Fukuhara, et al. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0236259.

CitationFull text

13.
Figure 5.

Figure 5. From: Evaluation of oral hygiene services in selected public health facilities in Lusaka district of Zambia.

Oral hygiene instructions.

Shary Josephin, et al. J Public Health Afr. 2018 Oct 1;9(2):820.

CitationFull text

14.
Figure 3

Figure 3. From: Electric and Manual Oral Hygiene Routines Affect Plaque Index Score Differently.

Oral hygiene routines for all participants.

Shaima Bahammam, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec;18(24):13123.

CitationFull text

15.
Figure 1

Figure 1. From: Oral hygiene and habits of children with autism spectrum disorders and their families.

Oral Hygiene and Dental Care Questionnaire.

Simone R. V. Hage, et al. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Aug;12(8):e719-e724.

CitationFull text

16.
Figure 4

Figure 4. From: Light-Induced Fluorescence-Based Device and Hybrid Mobile App for Oral Hygiene Management at Home: Development and Usability Study.

Flowchart of oral hygiene analysis.

Jun-Min Kim, et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct;8(10):e17881.

CitationFull text

17.
Question 1 Figure 1

Question 1 Figure 1. From: Oral hygiene practices in nurseries (0-3 years) in the cities of Pavia and Vigevano.

Is oral hygiene practised at your nursery? 50% of the nurseries replied yes; 30% replied no; 20% have carried out oral hygiene activities on a project basis or have discntinued them due to Covid.

Marzia Segù, et al. Front Oral Health. 2022;3:991741.

CitationFull text

18.
FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. From: Associations Between Poor Oral Hygiene and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer.

Sensitivity analysis of the meta-analysis of the correlation between oral hygiene and PC. The HR/RR/OR and 95% CI were determined by omitting each study from the pool of eligible studies concerning the link between oral hygiene and PC.

Shuai Xu, et al. Pancreas. 2022 Sep;51(8):985-994.

CitationFull text

19.
Figure 1

Figure 1. From: Oral hygiene practices in the pandemic- Evidence-based discussion of 8 common issues.

The summary of safe oral hygiene practices in COVID-19

Santosh Palla, et al. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Jan;11(1):407-409.

CitationFull text

20.
Graph 1

Graph 1. From: Evaluation of Oral Hygiene Status among 12–14-Year-Old School Children.

Mean plaque score and oral hygiene habits

Deepesh Jaiswal, et al. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Jun;13(Suppl 1):S112-S115.

CitationFull text

Display Settings:

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Clear Turn Off Turn On

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
You are here: NCBI > Literature > PubMed Central (PMC)
Support Center