Effects of idazoxan alone or co-administered with agomelatine, gabapentin or ‘agomelatine + gabapentin’ on mechanical allodynia in CCI-SN (A) and CCI-ION (B) rats. Left panels: Idazoxan (2 mg/kg i.p.) or its vehicle (saline) was administered 30 min before other treatments in rats whose right SN (A) or ION (B) had been ligated 2 weeks before. Five different treatment groups were made: (1) idazoxan + HEC + saline, (2) idazoxan + agomelatine (45 mg/kg) + saline, (3) idazoxan + HEC + gabapentin (50 mg/kg), (4) agomelatine + gabapentin, (5) idazoxan + agomelatine + gabapentin. Pressure threshold values (as g) were determined as described in the legend to Figure . Each point is the mean ± SEM of independent determinations in n rats for each condition. ∗P < 0.05, compared with pressure threshold values determined just prior to treatments (0 on abscissa), one way ANOVA with repeated measures, Dunnett’s test. C on abscissa: intact healthy rats before surgery. In both CCI-SN (A) and CCI-ION (B) rats, ‘saline+HEC’-treated groups were also included, but, for the sake of clarity, corresponding data are not represented as they superimposed with those obtained in rats treated with idazoxan + HEC + saline. Right panels: AUC values calculated from the respective time-course curves: (1) idazoxan + HEC + saline [n = 7 (A), n = 5 (B)]; (2) idazoxan + agomelatine + saline (n = 6/6); (3) idazoxan + HEC + gabapentin (n = 6/5); (4) agomelatine + gabapentin (n = 7/6); 5 = idazoxan + agomelatine + gabapentin (n = 7/14). A- CCI-SN : one way ANOVA [F(4,28) = 16.33, P < 0.0001] followed by Tukey’s test (∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001); B- CCI-ION : one way ANOVA [F(4,35) = 8.267, P < 0.0001] followed by Tukey’s test (∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001).