ClinVar Genomic variation as it relates to human health
NM_002878.4(RAD51D):c.698A>G (p.Glu233Gly)
The aggregate germline classification for this variant, typically for a monogenic or Mendelian disorder as in the ACMG/AMP guidelines, or for response to a drug. This value is calculated by NCBI based on data from submitters. Read our rules for calculating the aggregate classification.
Stars represent the aggregate review status, or the level of review supporting the aggregate germline classification for this VCV record. This value is calculated by NCBI based on data from submitters. Read our rules for calculating the review status. The number of submissions which contribute to this review status is shown in parentheses.
No data submitted for somatic clinical impact
No data submitted for oncogenicity
Variant Details
- Identifiers
-
NM_002878.4(RAD51D):c.698A>G (p.Glu233Gly)
Variation ID: 138873 Accession: VCV000138873.46
- Type and length
-
single nucleotide variant, 1 bp
- Location
-
Cytogenetic: 17q12 17: 35103294 (GRCh38) [ NCBI UCSC ] 17: 33430313 (GRCh37) [ NCBI UCSC ]
- Timeline in ClinVar
-
First in ClinVar Help The date this variant first appeared in ClinVar with each type of classification.
Last submission Help The date of the most recent submission for each type of classification for this variant.
Last evaluated Help The most recent date that a submitter evaluated this variant for each type of classification.
Germline Jan 31, 2016 Sep 29, 2024 Feb 1, 2024 - HGVS
-
Nucleotide Protein Molecular
consequenceNM_002878.4:c.698A>G MANE Select Help Transcripts from the Matched Annotation from the NCBI and EMBL-EBI (MANE) collaboration.
NP_002869.3:p.Glu233Gly missense NM_001142571.2:c.758A>G NP_001136043.1:p.Glu253Gly missense NM_133629.3:c.362A>G NP_598332.1:p.Glu121Gly missense NR_037711.2:n.724A>G non-coding transcript variant NR_037712.2:n.589A>G non-coding transcript variant NR_037714.1:n.450A>G non-coding transcript variant NC_000017.11:g.35103294T>C NC_000017.10:g.33430313T>C NG_031858.1:g.21576A>G LRG_516:g.21576A>G LRG_516t1:c.698A>G LRG_516p1:p.Glu233Gly O75771:p.Glu233Gly - Protein change
- E233G, E253G, E121G
- Other names
-
p.E233G:GAG>GGG
- Canonical SPDI
- NC_000017.11:35103293:T:C
-
Functional
consequence HelpThe effect of the variant on RNA or protein function, based on experimental evidence from submitters.
- -
-
Global minor allele
frequency (GMAF) HelpThe global minor allele frequency calculated by the 1000 Genomes Project. The minor allele at this location is indicated in parentheses and may be different from the allele represented by this VCV record.
-
0.00439 (C)
-
Allele frequency
Help
The frequency of the allele represented by this VCV record.
-
1000 Genomes Project 0.00439
1000 Genomes Project 30x 0.00500
The Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), exomes 0.00966
NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) Exome Variant Server 0.01269
Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) 0.01097
The Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) 0.01102
Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) 0.01144
- Links
Genes
Gene | OMIM | ClinGen Gene Dosage Sensitivity Curation |
Variation Viewer
Help
Links to Variation Viewer, a genome browser to view variation data from NCBI databases. |
Related variants | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HI score
Help
The haploinsufficiency score for the gene, curated by ClinGen’s Dosage Sensitivity Curation task team. |
TS score
Help
The triplosensitivity score for the gene, curated by ClinGen’s Dosage Sensitivity Curation task team. |
Within gene
Help
The number of variants in ClinVar that are contained within this gene, with a link to view the list of variants. |
All
Help
The number of variants in ClinVar for this gene, including smaller variants within the gene and larger CNVs that overlap or fully contain the gene. |
|||
RAD51D | Sufficient evidence for dosage pathogenicity | No evidence available |
GRCh38 GRCh37 |
34 | 1819 | |
RAD51L3-RFFL | - | - | - | GRCh38 | - | 1798 |
Conditions - Germline
Condition
Help
The condition for this variant-condition (RCV) record in ClinVar. |
Classification
Help
The aggregate germline classification for this variant-condition (RCV) record in ClinVar. The number of submissions that contribute to this aggregate classification is shown in parentheses. (# of submissions) |
Review status
Help
The aggregate review status for this variant-condition (RCV) record in ClinVar. This value is calculated by NCBI based on data from submitters. Read our rules for calculating the review status. |
Last evaluated
Help
The most recent date that a submitter evaluated this variant for the condition. |
Variation/condition record
Help
The RCV accession number, with most recent version number, for the variant-condition record, with a link to the RCV web page. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Benign (3) |
criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
|
Nov 26, 2014 | RCV000128967.10 | |
Benign/Likely benign (4) |
criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
|
Feb 1, 2024 | RCV000203773.26 | |
Benign/Likely benign (8) |
criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
|
Aug 15, 2023 | RCV000212967.23 | |
Benign/Likely benign (3) |
criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
|
Aug 9, 2017 | RCV000588832.11 | |
Benign (1) |
no assertion criteria provided
|
- | RCV001354814.4 | |
Likely benign (1) |
no assertion criteria provided
|
Sep 15, 2021 | RCV001723701.3 |
Submissions - Germline
Classification
Help
The submitted germline classification for each SCV record. (Last evaluated) |
Review status
Help
Stars represent the review status, or the level of review supporting the submitted (SCV) record. This value is calculated by NCBI based on data from the submitter. Read our rules for calculating the review status. This column also includes a link to the submitter’s assertion criteria if provided, and the collection method. (Assertion criteria) |
Condition
Help
The condition for the classification, provided by the submitter for this submitted (SCV) record. This column also includes the affected status and allele origin of individuals observed with this variant. |
Submitter
Help
The submitting organization for this submitted (SCV) record. This column also includes the SCV accession and version number, the date this SCV first appeared in ClinVar, and the date that this SCV was last updated in ClinVar. |
More information
Help
This column includes more information supporting the classification, including citations, the comment on classification, and detailed evidence provided as observations of the variant by the submitter. |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benign
(Nov 26, 2014)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
germline
|
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Accession: SCV000292107.1
First in ClinVar: Jul 08, 2016 Last updated: Jul 08, 2016 |
|
|
Likely benign
(Mar 13, 2018)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
not specified
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
germline
|
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Accession: SCV000859932.1
First in ClinVar: Sep 13, 2018 Last updated: Sep 13, 2018 |
Number of individuals with the variant: 2
Sex: mixed
|
|
Benign
(Aug 15, 2023)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
not specified
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
germline
|
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Accession: SCV002550915.4
First in ClinVar: Jul 28, 2022 Last updated: Aug 18, 2023 |
|
|
Benign
(Feb 01, 2024)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
germline
|
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Accession: SCV000262197.7
First in ClinVar: Jan 31, 2016 Last updated: Feb 20, 2024 |
|
|
Likely benign
(-)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: not provided
|
not provided
(Unknown mechanism)
Affected status: yes
Allele origin:
germline
|
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Accession: SCV005214637.1
First in ClinVar: Sep 29, 2024 Last updated: Sep 29, 2024 |
|
|
Benign
(Aug 09, 2017)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
not provided
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
germline
|
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Accession: SCV000698112.1
First in ClinVar: Mar 17, 2018 Last updated: Mar 17, 2018 |
Comment:
Variant summary: The RAD51D c.698A>G (p.Glu233Gly) variant locatedin the DNA recombination and repair protein RAD51-like, C-terminal domain (via InterPro) involves the alteration of a conserved … (more)
Variant summary: The RAD51D c.698A>G (p.Glu233Gly) variant locatedin the DNA recombination and repair protein RAD51-like, C-terminal domain (via InterPro) involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide and 3/4 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 2670/277696 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0164 (2034/124022, 20 homozygotes). This frequency is about 131 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic RAD51D variant (0.000125), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Non-Finnish) origin. Multiple case-control studies also showed that this variant does not confer an increased risk to breast or ovarian cancer (Rodrguez-Lpez 2004, Dowty 2008, Jara 2010, Loveday 2011). Although, the variant was shown to confer a slight increased risk for breast cancer in the BRCA-negative only with BrC cases (p-value = 0.02), this finding was not reproducible in a second study in Chilean BRCA1/2 negative women with a positive family history of breast cancer (Rodrguez-Lpez 2004, Jara 2010). Several in-vitro studies on human cancer cell lines, RAD51D-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts, and Yeast two-hybrid analysis have reported increased resistance to DNA-damaging agents, increased cellular proliferation, and decreased interaction with RAD51C (Nadkarni_2009). However, these experimental models are generally considered as weak experimental evidence as it is not clear if the results and conclusions drawn from these studies are applicable to the mechanism and presentation of disease. Two computational studies reporting an effect of this variant on function provide conflicting results (Rodrguez-Lpez 2004 and Zhao_2014). In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories have classified the variant as likely benign/benign. Furthermore, multiple internal LCA samples report the variant to co-occur with another pathogenic variant: PALB2 - c.196C>T (p.Gln66X), MUTYH - c.1187G>A (p.Gly396Asp), BARD1 - c.1690C>T (p.Gln564X), and likely pathogenic, TP53, c.782+1G>T. Therefore, due to the high occurrence in controls, co-occurrences with another pathogenic variant, and no strong established associated risk, the variant of interest has been classified as benign". (less)
|
|
Benign
(Sep 09, 2013)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
not specified
Affected status: yes
Allele origin:
germline
|
GeneDx
Accession: SCV000171275.11
First in ClinVar: Jun 23, 2014 Last updated: Jun 01, 2016 |
Comment:
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at … (more)
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. (less)
|
|
Benign
(Nov 04, 2016)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
not specified
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
germline
|
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Accession: SCV000806585.1
First in ClinVar: Sep 13, 2018 Last updated: Sep 13, 2018 |
|
|
Likely benign
(Jun 09, 2016)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
unknown
|
Counsyl
Accession: SCV000488546.2
First in ClinVar: Jan 31, 2016 Last updated: Dec 24, 2022 |
|
|
Benign
(May 21, 2021)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
not specified
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
unknown
|
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Accession: SCV000889832.3
First in ClinVar: Mar 13, 2019 Last updated: Dec 31, 2022 |
|
|
Benign
(May 10, 2023)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
unknown
|
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Accession: SCV004044167.2
First in ClinVar: Oct 21, 2023 Last updated: Oct 28, 2023 |
Comment:
This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence … (more)
This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. (less)
|
|
Benign
(Sep 18, 2023)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
germline
|
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Accession: SCV000604996.8
First in ClinVar: Jun 01, 2016 Last updated: Feb 20, 2024 |
|
|
Benign
(Jun 10, 2014)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
germline
|
Ambry Genetics
Accession: SCV000172849.8
First in ClinVar: Aug 06, 2014 Last updated: May 01, 2024 |
Comment:
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation … (more)
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. (less)
|
|
Benign
(Jan 12, 2018)
|
no assertion criteria provided
Method: clinical testing
|
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
germline
|
True Health Diagnostics
Accession: SCV000788209.1
First in ClinVar: Jul 08, 2016 Last updated: Jul 08, 2016 |
|
|
Benign
(-)
|
no assertion criteria provided
Method: clinical testing
|
Malignant tumor of breast
Affected status: yes
Allele origin:
unknown
|
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Additional submitter:
Franklin by Genoox
Study: The Canadian Open Genetics Repository (COGR)
Accession: SCV001549519.1 First in ClinVar: Apr 13, 2021 Last updated: Apr 13, 2021 |
Comment:
The RAD51D p.Glu233Gly variant was identified in 252 of 14720 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.017) from Spanish, Australian, British and Chilean individuals or families with BRCA1/BRCA2 … (more)
The RAD51D p.Glu233Gly variant was identified in 252 of 14720 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.017) from Spanish, Australian, British and Chilean individuals or families with BRCA1/BRCA2 negative breast and ovarian cancers (with or without family history), and was present in 134 of 8936 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.015) from healthy individuals (Song 2015 , Rodriguez-Lopez 2004, Osher 2012, Gutierrez-Enriquez 2013, Dowty 2007, Jara 2010). In multiple case control studies, there was no evidence to support an association between the variant and increased risk of breast cancer, nor any evidence of association between the RAD51D-E233G variant and BC who have a positive family history (Dowty 2007, Jara 2010), but rather a low penetrance susceptibility gene in high risk site specific familial breast cancer with segregation studies finding incomplete segregation with disease (Rodriguez-Lopez 2004). Rolland et al (2014) described a systematic map of human binary protein-protein interactions which showed that the variant affects interactions with a number of proteins, including the known cancer gene product IKZF1. Functional studies also suggest that the variant affects RAD51D functions and protein interactions, by increasing cellular resistance to DNA damaging agents (chemoresistant), contributing to telomere dysfunction by conferring cellular proliferation and decreasing the interaction with RAD51C (Nadkarni 2009). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs28363284) as “other”, Clinvitae database (classifications benign, likely benign and conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity), Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD), the ClinVar database (classification benign by GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, Invitae, color Genomics Inc., and likely benign by Illumina and Counsyl). The variant was also identified in control databases in 2567 of 271538 (20 homozygous) chromosomes at a frequency of 0.009 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017), identified in the following populations at a frequency greater than 1%: European (Non-Finnish) in 2034 of 124022 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), and Other in 63 of 6354 chromosomes (freq: 0.01). The p.Glu233 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; however, this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. (less)
|
|
Likely benign
(Sep 15, 2021)
|
no assertion criteria provided
Method: clinical testing
|
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
germline
|
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Accession: SCV001950157.1
First in ClinVar: Oct 02, 2021 Last updated: Oct 02, 2021 |
|
|
Benign
(-)
|
no assertion criteria provided
Method: clinical testing
|
not specified
Affected status: yes
Allele origin:
germline
|
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Additional submitter:
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Study: VKGL Data-share Consensus
Accession: SCV001955923.1 First in ClinVar: Oct 02, 2021 Last updated: Oct 02, 2021 |
|
|
Benign
(-)
|
no assertion criteria provided
Method: clinical testing
|
not specified
Affected status: yes
Allele origin:
germline
|
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Study: VKGL Data-share Consensus
Accession: SCV001809201.1 First in ClinVar: Aug 27, 2021 Last updated: Aug 27, 2021 |
|
|
Benign
(-)
|
no assertion criteria provided
Method: clinical testing
|
not specified
Affected status: yes
Allele origin:
germline
|
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Additional submitter:
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Study: VKGL Data-share Consensus
Accession: SCV001906350.1 First in ClinVar: Sep 23, 2021 Last updated: Sep 23, 2021 |
|
|
Likely benign
(-)
|
no assertion criteria provided
Method: clinical testing
|
not provided
Affected status: yes
Allele origin:
germline
|
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Additional submitter:
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Study: VKGL Data-share Consensus
Accession: SCV002036356.1 First in ClinVar: Dec 18, 2021 Last updated: Dec 18, 2021 |
|
|
click to load more click to collapse |
Germline Functional Evidence
There is no functional evidence in ClinVar for this variation. If you have generated functional data for this variation, please consider submitting that data to ClinVar. |
Citations for germline classification of this variant
HelpTitle | Author | Journal | Year | Link |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gene panel sequencing in familial breast/ovarian cancer patients identifies multiple novel mutations also in genes others than BRCA1/2. | Kraus C | International journal of cancer | 2017 | PMID: 27616075 |
Evaluation of ACMG-Guideline-Based Variant Classification of Cancer Susceptibility and Non-Cancer-Associated Genes in Families Affected by Breast Cancer. | Maxwell KN | American journal of human genetics | 2016 | PMID: 27153395 |
Germline mutations of the DNA repair pathways in uterine serous carcinoma. | Frimer M | Gynecologic oncology | 2016 | PMID: 27016235 |
267 Spanish Exomes Reveal Population-Specific Differences in Disease-Related Genetic Variation. | Dopazo J | Molecular biology and evolution | 2016 | PMID: 26764160 |
Systematic evaluation of underlying defects in DNA repair as an approach to case-only assessment of familial prostate cancer. | Nicolas E | Oncotarget | 2015 | PMID: 26485759 |
Contribution of Germline Mutations in the RAD51B, RAD51C, and RAD51D Genes to Ovarian Cancer in the Population. | Song H | Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology | 2015 | PMID: 26261251 |
Use of panel tests in place of single gene tests in the cancer genetics clinic. | Yorczyk A | Clinical genetics | 2015 | PMID: 25318351 |
Determining effects of non-synonymous SNPs on protein-protein interactions using supervised and semi-supervised learning. | Zhao N | PLoS computational biology | 2014 | PMID: 24784581 |
About 1% of the breast and ovarian Spanish families testing negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 are carriers of RAD51D pathogenic variants. | Gutiérrez-Enríquez S | International journal of cancer | 2014 | PMID: 24130102 |
Mutation analysis of RAD51D in non-BRCA1/2 ovarian and breast cancer families. | Osher DJ | British journal of cancer | 2012 | PMID: 22415235 |
Germline mutations in RAD51D confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer. | Loveday C | Nature genetics | 2011 | PMID: 21822267 |
Variants in DNA double-strand break repair genes and risk of familial breast cancer in a South American population. | Jara L | Breast cancer research and treatment | 2010 | PMID: 20054644 |
Cisplatin resistance conferred by the RAD51D (E233G) genetic variant is dependent upon p53 status in human breast carcinoma cell lines. | Nadkarni A | Molecular carcinogenesis | 2009 | PMID: 19347880 |
Functional characterization of the RAD51D E233G genetic variant. | Nadkarni A | Pharmacogenetics and genomics | 2009 | PMID: 19033885 |
The RAD51D E233G variant and breast cancer risk: population-based and clinic-based family studies of Australian women. | Dowty JG | Breast cancer research and treatment | 2008 | PMID: 18058226 |
The variant E233G of the RAD51D gene could be a low-penetrance allele in high-risk breast cancer families without BRCA1/2 mutations. | Rodríguez-López R | International journal of cancer | 2004 | PMID: 15170666 |
http://www.egl-eurofins.com/emvclass/emvclass.php?approved_symbol=RAD51D | - | - | - | - |
click to load more click to collapse |
Text-mined citations for rs28363284 ...
HelpRecord last updated Sep 29, 2024
This date represents the last time this VCV record was updated. The update may be due to an update to one of the included submitted records (SCVs), or due to an update that ClinVar made to the variant such as adding HGVS expressions or a rs number. So this date may be different from the date of the “most recent submission” reported at the top of this page.