U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_019098.5(CNGB3):c.466T>G (p.Ser156Ala) AND not provided

Germline classification:
Uncertain significance (1 submission)
Last evaluated:
Oct 13, 2023
Review status:
1 star out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, single submitter
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV003687891.1

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_019098.5(CNGB3):c.466T>G (p.Ser156Ala)]

NM_019098.5(CNGB3):c.466T>G (p.Ser156Ala)

Gene:
CNGB3:cyclic nucleotide gated channel subunit beta 3 [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
8q21.3
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_019098.5(CNGB3):c.466T>G (p.Ser156Ala)
HGVS:
  • NC_000008.11:g.86670971A>C
  • NG_016980.1:g.77705T>G
  • NM_019098.5:c.466T>GMANE SELECT
  • NP_061971.3:p.Ser156Ala
  • NC_000008.10:g.87683199A>C
Protein change:
S156A
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_019098.5:c.466T>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
none provided
Identifiers:
MedGen: C3661900

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV004445638Invitae
criteria provided, single submitter

(Invitae Variant Classification Sherloc (09022015))
Uncertain significance
(Oct 13, 2023)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (4)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

CNGB3 mutations account for 50% of all cases with autosomal recessive achromatopsia.

Kohl S, Varsanyi B, Antunes GA, Baumann B, Hoyng CB, Jägle H, Rosenberg T, Kellner U, Lorenz B, Salati R, Jurklies B, Farkas A, Andreasson S, Weleber RG, Jacobson SG, Rudolph G, Castellan C, Dollfus H, Legius E, Anastasi M, Bitoun P, Lev D, et al.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2005 Mar;13(3):302-8.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
15657609

Genetics and Disease Expression in the CNGA3 Form of Achromatopsia: Steps on the Path to Gene Therapy.

Zelinger L, Cideciyan AV, Kohl S, Schwartz SB, Rosenmann A, Eli D, Sumaroka A, Roman AJ, Luo X, Brown C, Rosin B, Blumenfeld A, Wissinger B, Jacobson SG, Banin E, Sharon D.

Ophthalmology. 2015 May;122(5):997-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.11.025. Epub 2015 Jan 21.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
25616768
See all PubMed Citations (4)

Details of each submission

From Invitae, SCV004445638.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (4)

Description

This sequence change replaces serine, which is neutral and polar, with alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 156 of the CNGB3 protein (p.Ser156Ala). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CNGB3-related conditions. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on CNGB3 protein function. This variant disrupts the p.Ser156 amino acid residue in CNGB3. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 15657609, 25616768, 28795510). This suggests that this residue is clinically significant, and that variants that disrupt this residue are likely to be disease-causing. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Feb 28, 2024