U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_001136472.2(LITAF):c.268C>T (p.Arg90Cys) AND not specified

Germline classification:
Uncertain significance (1 submission)
Last evaluated:
Feb 14, 2023
Review status:
1 star out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, single submitter
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV003155313.1

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_001136472.2(LITAF):c.268C>T (p.Arg90Cys)]

NM_001136472.2(LITAF):c.268C>T (p.Arg90Cys)

Gene:
LITAF:lipopolysaccharide induced TNF factor [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
16p13.13
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_001136472.2(LITAF):c.268C>T (p.Arg90Cys)
HGVS:
  • NC_000016.10:g.11553642G>A
  • NG_009008.1:g.38309C>T
  • NM_001136472.2:c.268C>TMANE SELECT
  • NM_001136473.1:c.268C>T
  • NM_004862.4:c.268C>T
  • NP_001129944.1:p.Arg90Cys
  • NP_001129945.1:p.Arg90Cys
  • NP_004853.2:p.Arg90Cys
  • NP_004853.2:p.Arg90Cys
  • LRG_253t1:c.268C>T
  • LRG_253:g.38309C>T
  • LRG_253p1:p.Arg90Cys
  • NC_000016.9:g.11647498G>A
  • NM_004862.3:c.268C>T
  • NR_024320.2:n.402C>T
Protein change:
R90C
Links:
dbSNP: rs375665454
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs375665454
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_001136472.2:c.268C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001136473.1:c.268C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_004862.4:c.268C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NR_024320.2:n.402C>T - non-coding transcript variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001619]

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
AllHighlyPenetrant
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN169374

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV003844707Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Uncertain significance
(Feb 14, 2023)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

Citation Link

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Comprehensive genetic sequence and copy number analysis for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in a Canadian cohort of 2517 patients.

Volodarsky M, Kerkhof J, Stuart A, Levy M, Brady LI, Tarnopolsky M, Lin H, Ainsworth P, Sadikovic B.

J Med Genet. 2021 Apr;58(4):284-288. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106641. Epub 2020 May 6.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
32376792

Details of each submission

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV003844707.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

Variant summary: LITAF c.268C>T (p.Arg90Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the LPS-induced tumour necrosis factor alpha factor domain (IPR006629) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 9.6e-05 in 251016 control chromosomes. c.268C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Charcot-Marie Disease Type 1C (Volodarsky_2020). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Charcot-Marie Disease Type 1C. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two ClinVar submitters have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance (n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Feb 28, 2024