U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_000360.4(TH):c.702G>T (p.Glu234Asp) AND Autosomal recessive DOPA responsive dystonia

Germline classification:
Uncertain significance (1 submission)
Last evaluated:
May 29, 2022
Review status:
1 star out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, single submitter
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV003068517.1

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_000360.4(TH):c.702G>T (p.Glu234Asp)]

NM_000360.4(TH):c.702G>T (p.Glu234Asp)

Gene:
TH:tyrosine hydroxylase [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
11p15.5
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_000360.4(TH):c.702G>T (p.Glu234Asp)
HGVS:
  • NC_000011.10:g.2167026C>A
  • NG_008128.1:g.9780G>T
  • NM_000360.4:c.702G>TMANE SELECT
  • NM_199292.3:c.795G>T
  • NM_199293.3:c.783G>T
  • NP_000351.2:p.Glu234Asp
  • NP_954986.2:p.Glu265Asp
  • NP_954987.2:p.Glu261Asp
  • NC_000011.9:g.2188256C>A
Protein change:
E234D
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_000360.4:c.702G>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_199292.3:c.795G>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_199293.3:c.783G>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Name:
Autosomal recessive DOPA responsive dystonia
Synonyms:
Segawa syndrome, autosomal recessive; DYT-TH; TH-deficient dopa-responsive dystonia; See all synonyms [MedGen]
Identifiers:
MONDO: MONDO:0011551; MedGen: C2673535; Orphanet: 101150; OMIM: 605407

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV003456803Invitae
criteria provided, single submitter

(Invitae Variant Classification Sherloc (09022015))
Uncertain significance
(May 29, 2022)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.

Nykamp K, Anderson M, Powers M, Garcia J, Herrera B, Ho YY, Kobayashi Y, Patil N, Thusberg J, Westbrook M; Invitae Clinical Genomics Group., Topper S.

Genet Med. 2017 Oct;19(10):1105-1117. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.37. Epub 2017 May 11. Erratum in: Genet Med. 2020 Jan;22(1):240. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0624-9.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
28492532
PMCID:
PMC5632818

Details of each submission

From Invitae, SCV003456803.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 265 of the TH protein (p.Glu265Asp). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with TH-related conditions. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt TH protein function. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may create or strengthen a splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Feb 13, 2023