U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_000322.5(PRPH2):c.500G>T (p.Gly167Val) AND PRPH2-related disorder

Germline classification:
Likely pathogenic (1 submission)
Last evaluated:
Apr 17, 2022
Review status:
1 star out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, single submitter
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV003047754.2

Allele description

NM_000322.5(PRPH2):c.500G>T (p.Gly167Val)

Gene:
PRPH2:peripherin 2 [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
6p21.1
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_000322.5(PRPH2):c.500G>T (p.Gly167Val)
HGVS:
  • NC_000006.12:g.42721835C>A
  • NG_009176.2:g.5786G>T
  • NM_000322.5:c.500G>TMANE SELECT
  • NP_000313.2:p.Gly167Val
  • NC_000006.11:g.42689573C>A
Protein change:
G167V
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_000322.5:c.500G>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Name:
PRPH2-related disorder
Synonyms:
PRPH2-Related Disorders; PRPH2-related condition
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN239395

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV003340690Invitae
criteria provided, single submitter

(Invitae Variant Classification Sherloc (09022015))
Likely pathogenic
(Apr 17, 2022)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (5)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

A novel mutation in the RDS gene in an Italian family with pattern dystrophy.

Testa F, Marini V, Rossi S, Interlandi E, Nesti A, Rinaldi M, Varano M, Garré C, Simonelli F.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Aug;89(8):1066-8. No abstract available.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
16024869
PMCID:
PMC1772774

Panel-based next generation sequencing as a reliable and efficient technique to detect mutations in unselected patients with retinal dystrophies.

Glöckle N, Kohl S, Mohr J, Scheurenbrand T, Sprecher A, Weisschuh N, Bernd A, Rudolph G, Schubach M, Poloschek C, Zrenner E, Biskup S, Berger W, Wissinger B, Neidhardt J.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Jan;22(1):99-104. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.72. Epub 2013 Apr 17.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
23591405
PMCID:
PMC3865404
See all PubMed Citations (5)

Details of each submission

From Invitae, SCV003340690.2

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (5)

Description

This sequence change replaces glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 167 of the PRPH2 protein (p.Gly167Val). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with PRPH2-related conditions. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt PRPH2 protein function. This variant disrupts the p.Gly167 amino acid residue in PRPH2. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 16024869, 23591405, 25324289, 28559085). This suggests that this residue is clinically significant, and that variants that disrupt this residue are likely to be disease-causing. In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: May 12, 2024