U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_003239.5(TGFB3):c.892A>C (p.Lys298Gln) AND Rienhoff syndrome

Germline classification:
Uncertain significance (1 submission)
Last evaluated:
Apr 16, 2020
Review status:
1 star out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, single submitter
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV002545136.10

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_003239.5(TGFB3):c.892A>C (p.Lys298Gln)]

NM_003239.5(TGFB3):c.892A>C (p.Lys298Gln)

Gene:
TGFB3:transforming growth factor beta 3 [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
14q24.3
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_003239.5(TGFB3):c.892A>C (p.Lys298Gln)
HGVS:
  • NC_000014.9:g.75963350T>G
  • NG_011715.1:g.23400A>C
  • NM_001329938.2:c.892A>C
  • NM_001329939.2:c.892A>C
  • NM_003239.5:c.892A>CMANE SELECT
  • NP_001316867.1:p.Lys298Gln
  • NP_001316868.1:p.Lys298Gln
  • NP_003230.1:p.Lys298Gln
  • LRG_399t1:c.892A>C
  • LRG_399:g.23400A>C
  • NC_000014.8:g.76429693T>G
  • NM_003239.2:c.892A>C
Protein change:
K298Q
Links:
dbSNP: rs2035181062
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs2035181062
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_001329938.2:c.892A>C - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001329939.2:c.892A>C - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_003239.5:c.892A>C - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Name:
Rienhoff syndrome
Synonyms:
Loeys-Dietz syndrome 5
Identifiers:
MONDO: MONDO:0014262; MedGen: C3810012; OMIM: 615582

Recent activity

Clear Turn Off Turn On

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Help
Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)		Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)		OriginMethodCitations
SCV001514894Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(Invitae Variant Classification Sherloc (09022015))		Uncertain significance
(Apr 16, 2020) 		germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

Help

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.

Nykamp K, Anderson M, Powers M, Garcia J, Herrera B, Ho YY, Kobayashi Y, Patil N, Thusberg J, Westbrook M; Invitae Clinical Genomics Group., Topper S.

Genet Med. 2017 Oct;19(10):1105-1117. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.37. Epub 2017 May 11. Erratum in: Genet Med. 2020 Jan;22(1):240. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0624-9.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
28492532
PMCID:
PMC5632818

Details of each submission

From Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp, SCV001514894.4

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with TGFB3-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change replaces lysine with glutamine at codon 298 of the TGFB3 protein (p.Lys298Gln). The lysine residue is moderately conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between lysine and glutamine.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Nov 3, 2024