U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_052859.4(RFT1):c.200G>A (p.Arg67His) AND RFT1-congenital disorder of glycosylation

Germline classification:
Uncertain significance (1 submission)
Last evaluated:
Aug 12, 2022
Review status:
1 star out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, single submitter
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV002524642.2

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_052859.4(RFT1):c.200G>A (p.Arg67His)]

NM_052859.4(RFT1):c.200G>A (p.Arg67His)

Gene:
RFT1:RFT1 homolog [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
3p21.1
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_052859.4(RFT1):c.200G>A (p.Arg67His)
HGVS:
  • NC_000003.12:g.53123790C>T
  • NG_009203.1:g.11665G>A
  • NM_052859.4:c.200G>AMANE SELECT
  • NP_443091.1:p.Arg67His
  • NC_000003.11:g.53157806C>T
  • NM_052859.3:c.200G>A
Protein change:
R67H
Links:
dbSNP: rs753527390
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs753527390
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_052859.4:c.200G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Name:
RFT1-congenital disorder of glycosylation
Synonyms:
CDG In; Congenital disorder of glycosylation type 1N; RFT1-CDG
Identifiers:
MONDO: MONDO:0012783; MedGen: C2677590; Orphanet: 244310; OMIM: 612015

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV003524591Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(Invitae Variant Classification Sherloc (09022015))
Uncertain significance
(Aug 12, 2022)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (4)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Human RFT1 deficiency leads to a disorder of N-linked glycosylation.

Haeuptle MA, Pujol FM, Neupert C, Winchester B, Kastaniotis AJ, Aebi M, Hennet T.

Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Mar;82(3):600-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.12.021. Epub 2008 Feb 28.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
18313027
PMCID:
PMC2427296

Comprehensive description of the phenotype of the first case of congenital disorder of glycosylation due to RFT1 deficiency (CDG In).

Clayton PT, Grunewald S.

J Inherit Metab Dis. 2009 Dec;32 Suppl 1:S137-9. doi: 10.1007/s10545-009-1108-x. Epub 2009 Mar 11.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
19267216
See all PubMed Citations (4)

Details of each submission

From Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp, SCV003524591.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (4)

Description

This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with histidine, which is basic and polar, at codon 67 of the RFT1 protein (p.Arg67His). This variant is present in population databases (rs753527390, gnomAD 0.08%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RFT1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 372948). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Probably Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). This variant disrupts the p.Arg67 amino acid residue in RFT1. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 18313027, 19267216, 30653653). This suggests that this residue is clinically significant, and that variants that disrupt this residue are likely to be disease-causing. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2024