U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_152594.3(SPRED1):c.71G>A (p.Arg24Gln) AND Cardiovascular phenotype

Germline classification:
Likely pathogenic (1 submission)
Last evaluated:
Jan 20, 2017
Review status:
1 star out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, single submitter
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV002374619.2

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_152594.3(SPRED1):c.71G>A (p.Arg24Gln)]

NM_152594.3(SPRED1):c.71G>A (p.Arg24Gln)

Gene:
SPRED1:sprouty related EVH1 domain containing 1 [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
15q14
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_152594.3(SPRED1):c.71G>A (p.Arg24Gln)
HGVS:
  • NC_000015.10:g.38299411G>A
  • NG_008980.1:g.51561G>A
  • NM_152594.3:c.71G>AMANE SELECT
  • NP_689807.1:p.Arg24Gln
  • NC_000015.9:g.38591612G>A
  • NM_152594.2:c.71G>A
Protein change:
R24Q
Links:
dbSNP: rs1057518150
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs1057518150
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_152594.3:c.71G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Name:
Cardiovascular phenotype
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN230736

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV002670174Ambry Genetics
criteria provided, single submitter

(Ambry Variant Classification Scheme 2023)
Likely pathogenic
(Jan 20, 2017)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (2)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

Citation Link

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Identification of SPRED1 deletions using RT-PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and quantitative PCR.

Spencer E, Davis J, Mikhail F, Fu C, Vijzelaar R, Zackai EH, Feret H, Meyn MS, Shugar A, Bellus G, Kocsis K, Kivirikko S, Pöyhönen M, Messiaen L.

Am J Med Genet A. 2011 Jun;155A(6):1352-9. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33894. Epub 2011 May 5.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
21548021

Interaction between a Domain of the Negative Regulator of the Ras-ERK Pathway, SPRED1 Protein, and the GTPase-activating Protein-related Domain of Neurofibromin Is Implicated in Legius Syndrome and Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

Hirata Y, Brems H, Suzuki M, Kanamori M, Okada M, Morita R, Llano-Rivas I, Ose T, Messiaen L, Legius E, Yoshimura A.

J Biol Chem. 2016 Feb 12;291(7):3124-34. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.703710. Epub 2015 Dec 3.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
26635368
PMCID:
PMC4751360

Details of each submission

From Ambry Genetics, SCV002670174.2

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (2)

Description

The p.R24Q variant (also known as c.71G>A), located in coding exon 2 of the SPRED1 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 71. The arginine at codon 24 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This variant has been reported in multiple individuals without NF1 mutations who presented with a Legius syndrome phenotype. This variant has shown strong segregation with the clinical presentation of multiple café-au-lait macules (Spencer E et al, Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2011 Jun; 155A(6):1352-9; Hirata Y et al, J. Biol. Chem. 2016 Feb; 291(7):3124-34). By in vitro assays, this variant was suggested to partially reduce the interaction between SPRED1 EVH1 and NF1 GRD domains, and to relieve the SPRED1 suppression on ERK activity to a limited extent (Hirata Y et al, J. Biol. Chem. 2016 Feb; 291(7):3124-34). This variant was not reported in the ExAC database, with coverage at this position. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on the majority of available evidence to date, this variant is likely to be pathogenic.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Oct 8, 2024