U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_005236.3(ERCC4):c.2026G>C (p.Glu676Gln) AND multiple conditions

Germline classification:
Uncertain significance (1 submission)
Last evaluated:
Aug 14, 2021
Review status:
1 star out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, single submitter
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV002005843.6

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_005236.3(ERCC4):c.2026G>C (p.Glu676Gln)]

NM_005236.3(ERCC4):c.2026G>C (p.Glu676Gln)

Gene:
ERCC4:ERCC excision repair 4, endonuclease catalytic subunit [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
16p13.12
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_005236.3(ERCC4):c.2026G>C (p.Glu676Gln)
HGVS:
  • NC_000016.10:g.13947622G>C
  • NG_011442.1:g.32466G>C
  • NM_005236.3:c.2026G>CMANE SELECT
  • NP_005227.1:p.Glu676Gln
  • LRG_463:g.32466G>C
  • NC_000016.9:g.14041479G>C
Protein change:
E676Q
Links:
dbSNP: rs2141619663
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs2141619663
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_005236.3:c.2026G>C - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Name:
Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F (XPF)
Synonyms:
XERODERMA PIGMENTOSUM, COMPLEMENTATION GROUP F; XERODERMA PIGMENTOSUM VI; XP, GROUP F; See all synonyms [MedGen]
Identifiers:
MONDO: MONDO:0010215; MedGen: C0268140; OMIM: 278760
Name:
Cockayne syndrome
Synonyms:
Cockayne's syndrome; Dwarfism-retinal atrophy-deafness syndrome; Progeria-like syndrome; See all synonyms [MedGen]
Identifiers:
MONDO: MONDO:0016006; MedGen: C0009207
Name:
Fanconi anemia complementation group Q
Identifiers:
MONDO: MONDO:0014108; MedGen: C3808988; Orphanet: 84; OMIM: 615272

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV002272038Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(Invitae Variant Classification Sherloc (09022015))
Uncertain significance
(Aug 14, 2021)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.

Nykamp K, Anderson M, Powers M, Garcia J, Herrera B, Ho YY, Kobayashi Y, Patil N, Thusberg J, Westbrook M; Invitae Clinical Genomics Group., Topper S.

Genet Med. 2017 Oct;19(10):1105-1117. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.37. Epub 2017 May 11. Erratum in: Genet Med. 2020 Jan;22(1):240. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0624-9.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
28492532
PMCID:
PMC5632818

Details of each submission

From Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp, SCV002272038.3

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. This sequence change replaces glutamic acid with glutamine at codon 676 of the ERCC4 protein (p.Glu676Gln). The glutamic acid residue is moderately conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between glutamic acid and glutamine. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with ERCC4-related conditions. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2024