U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_000095.3(COMP):c.1317C>G (p.Asp439Glu) AND not provided

Germline classification:
Likely pathogenic (1 submission)
Last evaluated:
Sep 17, 2021
Review status:
1 star out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, single submitter
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV001377132.4

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_000095.3(COMP):c.1317C>G (p.Asp439Glu)]

NM_000095.3(COMP):c.1317C>G (p.Asp439Glu)

Gene:
COMP:cartilage oligomeric matrix protein [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
19p13.11
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_000095.3(COMP):c.1317C>G (p.Asp439Glu)
Other names:
p.Asp439Glu
HGVS:
  • NC_000019.10:g.18786137G>C
  • NG_007070.1:g.10168C>G
  • NM_000095.2:c.1317C>G
  • NM_000095.3:c.1317C>GMANE SELECT
  • NP_000086.2:p.Asp439Glu
  • NC_000019.9:g.18896947G>C
Protein change:
D439E
Links:
dbSNP: rs368273443
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs368273443
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_000095.3:c.1317C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
none provided
Identifiers:
MedGen: C3661900

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV001574372Invitae
criteria provided, single submitter

(Invitae Variant Classification Sherloc (09022015))
Likely pathogenic
(Sep 17, 2021)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (4)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

COMP mutation screening as an aid for the clinical diagnosis and counselling of patients with a suspected diagnosis of pseudoachondroplasia or multiple epiphyseal dysplasia.

Kennedy J, Jackson G, Ramsden S, Taylor J, Newman W, Wright MJ, Donnai D, Elles R, Briggs MD.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2005 May;13(5):547-55. Review.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
15756302
PMCID:
PMC2673054

A pilot study of gene testing of genetic bone dysplasia using targeted next-generation sequencing.

Zhang H, Yang R, Wang Y, Ye J, Han L, Qiu W, Gu X.

J Hum Genet. 2015 Dec;60(12):769-76. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2015.112. Epub 2015 Sep 17.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
26377240
See all PubMed Citations (4)

Details of each submission

From Invitae, SCV001574372.4

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (4)

Description

This variant disrupts the p.Asp439 amino acid residue in COMP. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been observed in individuals with COMP-related conditions (PMID: 15756302, 24595329, 26377240), which suggests that this may be a clinically significant amino acid residue. In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive. This missense change has been observed in individuals with clinical features of multiple epiphyseal dysplasia and/or pseudoachondroplasia (PMID: 24595329; Invitae). This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change replaces aspartic acid with glutamic acid at codon 439 of the COMP protein (p.Asp439Glu). The aspartic acid residue is highly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between aspartic acid and glutamic acid.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Feb 28, 2024