NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.179G>C (p.Cys60Ser) AND Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma

Germline classification:
Uncertain significance (1 submission)
Last evaluated:
Sep 9, 2019
Review status:
1 star out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, single submitter
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV001226552.7

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.179G>C (p.Cys60Ser)]

NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.179G>C (p.Cys60Ser)

Gene:
CDH1:cadherin 1 [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
16q22.1
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.179G>C (p.Cys60Ser)
HGVS:
  • NC_000016.10:g.68801685G>C
  • NG_008021.1:g.69394G>C
  • NM_001317184.2:c.179G>C
  • NM_001317185.2:c.-1437G>C
  • NM_001317186.2:c.-1641G>C
  • NM_004360.5:c.179G>CMANE SELECT
  • NP_001304113.1:p.Cys60Ser
  • NP_004351.1:p.Cys60Ser
  • LRG_301t1:c.179G>C
  • LRG_301:g.69394G>C
  • NC_000016.9:g.68835588G>C
  • NM_004360.3:c.179G>C
Protein change:
C60S
Links:
dbSNP: rs1960504905
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs1960504905
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_001317185.2:c.-1437G>C - 5 prime UTR variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001623]
  • NM_001317186.2:c.-1641G>C - 5 prime UTR variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001623]
  • NM_001317184.2:c.179G>C - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_004360.5:c.179G>C - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Name:
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma (HDGC)
Synonyms:
Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer
Identifiers:
MONDO: MONDO:0007648; MedGen: C1708349; Orphanet: 26106; OMIM: 137215

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV001398872Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(Invitae Variant Classification Sherloc (09022015))
Uncertain significance
(Sep 9, 2019)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.

Nykamp K, Anderson M, Powers M, Garcia J, Herrera B, Ho YY, Kobayashi Y, Patil N, Thusberg J, Westbrook M; Invitae Clinical Genomics Group., Topper S.

Genet Med. 2017 Oct;19(10):1105-1117. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.37. Epub 2017 May 11. Erratum in: Genet Med. 2020 Jan;22(1):240. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0624-9.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
28492532
PMCID:
PMC5632818

Details of each submission

From Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp, SCV001398872.5

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Probably Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with CDH1-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change replaces cysteine with serine at codon 60 of the CDH1 protein (p.Cys60Ser). The cysteine residue is highly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between cysteine and serine.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2024