Description
The CDH1 p.Ser840= variant was identified in 5 of 558 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.009) from Spanish and Brazilian individuals or families with nonsyndromic orofacial cleft or MSH2-deficient Lynch syndrome, and was present in 2 of 1218 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from healthy individuals (Brito 2015, Vargas-Parra 2017). The variant was identified in 1 proband whose two colorectal tumors showed coexistence of double somatic mutations and completely different MSI profiles: the MSI tumor (cancer 1) mainly harbored deletions at homopolymeric sequences, whereas the MSS tumor (cancer 2) harbored substitutions (Vargas-Parra 2017). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs140328601) “With Likely benign allele”, ClinVar (classified benign by GeneDx and Invitae, and likely benign by Ambry Genetics), Clinvitae (3x), LOVD 3.0 (2x), and in control databases in 105 of 277240 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0004 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 42 of 24040 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Other in 5 of 6466 chromosomes (freq: 0.0008), Latino in 37 of 34418 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), European Non-Finnish in 21 of 126722 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, and Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The p.Ser840= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. This variant was identified in our laboratory with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA2 variant (c.3455T>G, p.Leu1152*) in the context of early onset TNBC, increasing the likelihood that the c.2520C>T variant does not have clinical significance. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign.
| # | Sample | Method | Observation |
|---|
| Origin | Affected | Number tested | Tissue | Purpose | Method | Individuals | Allele frequency | Families | Co-occurrences |
|---|
| 1 | unknown | yes | not provided | not provided | not provided | | not provided | not provided | not provided | not provided |
PubMed [ID: 36436516]