U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.1005T>C (p.Asn335=) AND not specified

Germline classification:
Likely benign (3 submissions)
Last evaluated:
Apr 9, 2020
Review status:
2 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV000613914.6

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.1005T>C (p.Asn335=)]

NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.1005T>C (p.Asn335=)

Gene:
NF1:neurofibromin 1 [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
17q11.2
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.1005T>C (p.Asn335=)
HGVS:
  • NC_000017.11:g.31200538T>C
  • NG_009018.1:g.110562T>C
  • NM_000267.3:c.1005T>C
  • NM_001042492.3:c.1005T>CMANE SELECT
  • NM_001128147.3:c.1005T>C
  • NP_000258.1:p.Asn335=
  • NP_001035957.1:p.Asn335=
  • NP_001035957.1:p.Asn335=
  • NP_001121619.1:p.Asn335=
  • LRG_214t1:c.1005T>C
  • LRG_214t2:c.1005T>C
  • LRG_214:g.110562T>C
  • LRG_214p1:p.Asn335=
  • LRG_214p2:p.Asn335=
  • NC_000017.10:g.29527556T>C
  • NM_001042492.2:c.1005T>C
  • NM_001042492.3:c.1005T>C
  • p.N335N
Links:
dbSNP: rs777369021
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs777369021
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_000267.3:c.1005T>C - synonymous variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001819]
  • NM_001042492.3:c.1005T>C - synonymous variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001819]
  • NM_001128147.3:c.1005T>C - synonymous variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001819]

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
AllHighlyPenetrant
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN169374

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV000718635GeneDx
criteria provided, single submitter

(GeneDx Variant Classification (06012015))
Likely benign
(Jan 2, 2018)
germlineclinical testing

Citation Link,

SCV001362235Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Likely benign
(Mar 14, 2019)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (3)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

Citation Link,

SCV002068089Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
criteria provided, single submitter

(ACMG Guidelines, 2015)
Likely benign
(Apr 9, 2020)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlinenonot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing
not providedgermlineyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Nf1 and Gmcsf interact in myeloid leukemogenesis.

Birnbaum RA, O'Marcaigh A, Wardak Z, Zhang YY, Dranoff G, Jacks T, Clapp DW, Shannon KM.

Mol Cell. 2000 Jan;5(1):189-95.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
10678181

Neurofibromatosis-1 gene deletions and mutations in de novo adult acute myeloid leukemia.

Boudry-Labis E, Roche-Lestienne C, Nibourel O, Boissel N, Terre C, Perot C, Eclache V, Gachard N, Tigaud I, Plessis G, Cuccuini W, Geffroy S, Villenet C, Figeac M, LeprĂȘtre F, Renneville A, Cheok M, Soulier J, Dombret H, Preudhomme C; French ALFA group..

Am J Hematol. 2013 Apr;88(4):306-11. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23403. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
23460398
See all PubMed Citations (4)

Details of each submission

From GeneDx, SCV000718635.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testingnot provided

Description

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV001362235.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (3)

Description

Variant summary: NF1 c.1005T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8.3e-05 in 277190 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in NF1 causing Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (8.3e-05 vs 0.00021), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. This variant has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (Gasparini_1996, Bottillo_2007), without strong evidence for causality. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant have been reported (Bottillo_2007; NF1 c.476delC , p.Arg160Glyfs*5), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. In an in vitro mini gene assay, the variant was shown to abolish an expression of an alternative transcript lacking exon 7, however the clinical significance of this outcome is unclear (Bottillo_2007). Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago, SCV002068089.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)
#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlinenonot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2024