U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_001943.5(DSG2):c.829-4G>A AND not specified

Germline classification:
Conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity (2 submissions)
Last evaluated:
Jul 31, 2018
Review status:
criteria provided, conflicting classifications
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV000441755.9

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_001943.5(DSG2):c.829-4G>A]

NM_001943.5(DSG2):c.829-4G>A

Gene:
DSG2:desmoglein 2 [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
18q12.1
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_001943.5(DSG2):c.829-4G>A
HGVS:
  • NC_000018.10:g.31524699G>A
  • NG_007072.3:g.31458G>A
  • NM_001943.5:c.829-4G>AMANE SELECT
  • LRG_397t1:c.829-4G>A
  • LRG_397:g.31458G>A
  • NC_000018.9:g.29104662G>A
  • NM_001943.3:c.829-4G>A
  • NM_001943.4:c.829-4G>A
Links:
dbSNP: rs376424003
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs376424003
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_001943.5:c.829-4G>A - intron variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001627]
Observations:
1

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
AllHighlyPenetrant
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN169374

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV000711381Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
criteria provided, single submitter

(LMM Criteria)
Likely benign
(May 27, 2016)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

SCV000917289Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Uncertain significance
(Jul 31, 2018)
germlineclinical testing

Citation Link

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing
not providedgermlinenot provided11not providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

A systematic approach to assessing the clinical significance of genetic variants.

Duzkale H, Shen J, McLaughlin H, Alfares A, Kelly MA, Pugh TJ, Funke BH, Rehm HL, Lebo MS.

Clin Genet. 2013 Nov;84(5):453-63. doi: 10.1111/cge.12257.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
24033266
PMCID:
PMC3995020

Details of each submission

From Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, SCV000711381.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not provided1not providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

c.829-4G>A in intron 7 of DSG2: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It ha s been identified in 1/3660 African American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequ encing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs376424003).

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlinenot providednot providednot providednot provided1not provided1not provided

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV000917289.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testingnot provided

Description

Variant summary: DSG2 c.829-4G>A alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 6.5e-05 in 30968 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.829-4G>A in individuals affected with Arrhythmia and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 with conflicting assessments, including uncertain significance (1x) and likely benign (3x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2024