U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.316+18G>A AND not specified

Germline classification:
Conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity (2 submissions)
Last evaluated:
Jan 6, 2020
Review status:
criteria provided, conflicting classifications
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV000425170.5

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.316+18G>A]

NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.316+18G>A

Gene:
BRCA2:BRCA2 DNA repair associated [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
13q13.1
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.316+18G>A
HGVS:
  • NC_000013.11:g.32319343G>A
  • NG_012772.3:g.8864G>A
  • NG_017006.2:g.1021C>T
  • NM_000059.4:c.316+18G>AMANE SELECT
  • LRG_293t1:c.316+18G>A
  • LRG_293:g.8864G>A
  • NC_000013.10:g.32893480G>A
  • NM_000059.3:c.316+18G>A
Links:
dbSNP: rs760439858
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs760439858
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_000059.4:c.316+18G>A - intron variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001627]

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
AllHighlyPenetrant
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN169374

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV000518184GeneDx
criteria provided, single submitter

(GeneDx Variant Classification (06012015))
Likely benign
(Oct 30, 2017)
germlineclinical testing

Citation Link,

SCV001338005Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Uncertain significance
(Jan 6, 2020)
germlineclinical testing

Citation Link

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Details of each submission

From GeneDx, SCV000518184.4

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testingnot provided

Description

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV001338005.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testingnot provided

Description

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.316+18G>A alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8.1e-06 in 245526 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.316+18G>A has been reported in the literature in at least one individual affected with Breast Cancer (e.g. Tabarestani_2017) without strong evidence for causality. This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cited the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2024