U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_000249.4(MLH1):c.1808C>G (p.Pro603Arg) AND not specified

Germline classification:
Benign/Likely benign (2 submissions)
Last evaluated:
Aug 15, 2023
Review status:
2 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV000417382.17

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_000249.4(MLH1):c.1808C>G (p.Pro603Arg)]

NM_000249.4(MLH1):c.1808C>G (p.Pro603Arg)

Gene:
MLH1:mutL homolog 1 [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
3p22.2
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_000249.4(MLH1):c.1808C>G (p.Pro603Arg)
Other names:
p.P603R:CCC>CGC
HGVS:
  • NC_000003.12:g.37047595C>G
  • NG_007109.2:g.59246C>G
  • NM_000249.4:c.1808C>GMANE SELECT
  • NM_001167617.3:c.1514C>G
  • NM_001167618.3:c.1085C>G
  • NM_001167619.3:c.1085C>G
  • NM_001258271.2:c.1808C>G
  • NM_001258273.2:c.1085C>G
  • NM_001258274.3:c.1085C>G
  • NM_001354615.2:c.1085C>G
  • NM_001354616.2:c.1085C>G
  • NM_001354617.2:c.1085C>G
  • NM_001354618.2:c.1085C>G
  • NM_001354619.2:c.1085C>G
  • NM_001354620.2:c.1514C>G
  • NM_001354621.2:c.785C>G
  • NM_001354622.2:c.785C>G
  • NM_001354623.2:c.785C>G
  • NM_001354624.2:c.734C>G
  • NM_001354625.2:c.734C>G
  • NM_001354626.2:c.734C>G
  • NM_001354627.2:c.734C>G
  • NM_001354628.2:c.1808C>G
  • NM_001354629.2:c.1709C>G
  • NM_001354630.2:c.1732-922C>G
  • NP_000240.1:p.Pro603Arg
  • NP_000240.1:p.Pro603Arg
  • NP_001161089.1:p.Pro505Arg
  • NP_001161090.1:p.Pro362Arg
  • NP_001161091.1:p.Pro362Arg
  • NP_001245200.1:p.Pro603Arg
  • NP_001245202.1:p.Pro362Arg
  • NP_001245203.1:p.Pro362Arg
  • NP_001341544.1:p.Pro362Arg
  • NP_001341545.1:p.Pro362Arg
  • NP_001341546.1:p.Pro362Arg
  • NP_001341547.1:p.Pro362Arg
  • NP_001341548.1:p.Pro362Arg
  • NP_001341549.1:p.Pro505Arg
  • NP_001341550.1:p.Pro262Arg
  • NP_001341551.1:p.Pro262Arg
  • NP_001341552.1:p.Pro262Arg
  • NP_001341553.1:p.Pro245Arg
  • NP_001341554.1:p.Pro245Arg
  • NP_001341555.1:p.Pro245Arg
  • NP_001341556.1:p.Pro245Arg
  • NP_001341557.1:p.Pro603Arg
  • NP_001341558.1:p.Pro570Arg
  • LRG_216t1:c.1808C>G
  • LRG_216:g.59246C>G
  • LRG_216p1:p.Pro603Arg
  • NC_000003.11:g.37089086C>G
  • NM_000249.3:c.1808C>G
  • P40692:p.Pro603Arg
  • p.P603R
Protein change:
P245R
Links:
UniProtKB: P40692#VAR_012925; dbSNP: rs63750876
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs63750876
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_001354630.2:c.1732-922C>G - intron variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001627]
  • NM_000249.4:c.1808C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001167617.3:c.1514C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001167618.3:c.1085C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001167619.3:c.1085C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001258271.2:c.1808C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001258273.2:c.1085C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001258274.3:c.1085C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354615.2:c.1085C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354616.2:c.1085C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354617.2:c.1085C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354618.2:c.1085C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354619.2:c.1085C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354620.2:c.1514C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354621.2:c.785C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354622.2:c.785C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354623.2:c.785C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354624.2:c.734C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354625.2:c.734C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354626.2:c.734C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354627.2:c.734C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354628.2:c.1808C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354629.2:c.1709C>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
AllHighlyPenetrant
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN169374

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV000919654Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Benign
(Oct 3, 2021)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (6)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

Citation Link,

SCV002760293Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
criteria provided, single submitter

(ACMG Guidelines, 2015)
Likely benign
(Aug 15, 2023)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Functional analysis of human MLH1 variants using yeast and in vitro mismatch repair assays.

Takahashi M, Shimodaira H, Andreutti-Zaugg C, Iggo R, Kolodner RD, Ishioka C.

Cancer Res. 2007 May 15;67(10):4595-604.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
17510385

A large fraction of unclassified variants of the mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2 is associated with splicing defects.

Tournier I, Vezain M, Martins A, Charbonnier F, Baert-Desurmont S, Olschwang S, Wang Q, Buisine MP, Soret J, Tazi J, Frébourg T, Tosi M.

Hum Mutat. 2008 Dec;29(12):1412-24. doi: 10.1002/humu.20796.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
18561205
See all PubMed Citations (7)

Details of each submission

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV000919654.2

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (6)

Description

Variant summary: MLH1 c.1808C>G (p.Pro603Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the DNA mismatch repair protein Mlh1, C-terminal domain (IPR032189) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00016 in 251344 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in MLH1 causing Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (0.00016 vs 0.00071), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. However, it is predominantly observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0028 (28/10076). This frequency is about 4 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic MLH1 variant (0.0007105), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of Ashkenazi Jewish origin. c.1808C>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with a variety of cancers such as Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer/Lynch syndrome, epithelial ovarian cancer (example, Hardt_2011, Tournier_2008, Pal_2012). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer/Lynch syndrome. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported in the UMD database (MLH1 complete gene deletion), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Several publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (example, Takahashi_2007, Drost_2018). The most pronounced variant effect results in 82.5% normal mismatch repair (MMR) activity (Takahashi_2007), while a subsequent study reports 97% of normal mismatch repair (MMR) activity (Drost_2018). Furthermore, binding partner interaction as determined by Y2H assays is +, Nuclear localization as determined by transfections of fluorescently tagged proteins combined with microscopy is + (Drost_2018). Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation with a predominant consensus as likely benign/benign (n=7) (VUS, n=2). Some submitters cite overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, SCV002760293.3

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)
#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Oct 20, 2024