U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_000546.6(TP53):c.869G>A (p.Arg290His) AND not specified

Germline classification:
Conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity (3 submissions)
Last evaluated:
Aug 15, 2023
Review status:
criteria provided, conflicting classifications
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV000213061.21

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_000546.6(TP53):c.869G>A (p.Arg290His)]

NM_000546.6(TP53):c.869G>A (p.Arg290His)

Gene:
TP53:tumor protein p53 [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
17p13.1
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_000546.6(TP53):c.869G>A (p.Arg290His)
Other names:
p.R290H:CGC>CAC
HGVS:
  • NC_000017.11:g.7673751C>T
  • NG_017013.2:g.18800G>A
  • NM_000546.6:c.869G>AMANE SELECT
  • NM_001126112.3:c.869G>A
  • NM_001126113.3:c.869G>A
  • NM_001126114.3:c.869G>A
  • NM_001126115.1:c.473G>A
  • NM_001126115.2:c.473G>A
  • NM_001126116.2:c.473G>A
  • NM_001126117.2:c.473G>A
  • NM_001126118.2:c.752G>A
  • NM_001276695.3:c.752G>A
  • NM_001276696.3:c.752G>A
  • NM_001276697.3:c.392G>A
  • NM_001276698.3:c.392G>A
  • NM_001276699.3:c.392G>A
  • NM_001276760.3:c.752G>A
  • NM_001276761.3:c.752G>A
  • NP_000537.3:p.Arg290His
  • NP_000537.3:p.Arg290His
  • NP_001119584.1:p.Arg290His
  • NP_001119585.1:p.Arg290His
  • NP_001119586.1:p.Arg290His
  • NP_001119587.1:p.Arg158His
  • NP_001119588.1:p.Arg158His
  • NP_001119589.1:p.Arg158His
  • NP_001119590.1:p.Arg251His
  • NP_001263624.1:p.Arg251His
  • NP_001263625.1:p.Arg251His
  • NP_001263626.1:p.Arg131His
  • NP_001263627.1:p.Arg131His
  • NP_001263628.1:p.Arg131His
  • NP_001263689.1:p.Arg251His
  • NP_001263690.1:p.Arg251His
  • LRG_321t1:c.869G>A
  • LRG_321:g.18800G>A
  • LRG_321p1:p.Arg290His
  • NC_000017.10:g.7577069C>T
  • NM_000546.4:c.869G>A
  • NM_000546.5(TP53):c.869G>A
  • NM_000546.5:c.869G>A
  • P04637:p.Arg290His
  • p.R290H
Protein change:
R131H
Links:
UniProtKB: P04637#VAR_045411; dbSNP: rs55819519
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs55819519
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_000546.6:c.869G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001126112.3:c.869G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001126113.3:c.869G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001126114.3:c.869G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001126115.2:c.473G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001126116.2:c.473G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001126117.2:c.473G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001126118.2:c.752G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001276695.3:c.752G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001276696.3:c.752G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001276697.3:c.392G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001276698.3:c.392G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001276699.3:c.392G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001276760.3:c.752G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001276761.3:c.752G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
AllHighlyPenetrant
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN169374

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV000540572Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
criteria provided, single submitter

(LMM Criteria)
Uncertain significance
(Jan 25, 2017)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

SCV000920323Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Benign
(May 23, 2022)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (29)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

Citation Link,

SCV002550936Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
criteria provided, single submitter

(ACMG Guidelines, 2015)
Benign
(Aug 15, 2023)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

A systematic approach to assessing the clinical significance of genetic variants.

Duzkale H, Shen J, McLaughlin H, Alfares A, Kelly MA, Pugh TJ, Funke BH, Rehm HL, Lebo MS.

Clin Genet. 2013 Nov;84(5):453-63. doi: 10.1111/cge.12257.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
24033266
PMCID:
PMC3995020

BRCA1, TP53, and CHEK2 germline mutations in uterine serous carcinoma.

Pennington KP, Walsh T, Lee M, Pennil C, Novetsky AP, Agnew KJ, Thornton A, Garcia R, Mutch D, King MC, Goodfellow P, Swisher EM.

Cancer. 2013 Jan 15;119(2):332-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27720. Epub 2012 Jul 18.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
22811390
PMCID:
PMC3966566
See all PubMed Citations (31)

Details of each submission

From Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, SCV000540572.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: This variant has been reported in 8 papers, including at least 3 individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome as well as individuals with other cancers. The variant has a Max MAF of 0.02% in ExAC (16 alleles) and 0.03% in gnomAD (9 Finnish alleles and 26 non-Finnish European alleles). It is classified with 1 star in ClinVar as VUS by Invitae, Ambry, GeneDx and CSER_CC_NCGL, and as Pathogenic by UCLA. 14 mammals and 2 non-mammals have a His at this position.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV000920323.2

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (29)

Description

Variant summary: TP53 c.869G>A (p.Arg290His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00016 in 251482 control chromosomes, predominantly within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation at a frequency of 0.00021 in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 5-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency (MPAF) for a pathogenic variant in TP53 causing Li-Fraumeni Syndrome phenotype (4e-05). In addition, the variant was reported to be found in the FLOSSIES database in 7/9884 women, who were older than age 70 years and have never had cancer. The frequency in this cohort (0.000354) is ~9-fold higher than MPAF, strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism. The variant, c.869G>A, has also been reported in the literature in individuals affected with (suspected) Li-Fraumeni Syndrome and various tumor phenotypes, however, without strong evidence for causality. Multiple publications also reported experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, and demonstrated that the variant overall did not decrease Tp53 expression, transcription activity, and function measured at the cellular level (e.g. Quesnel_1999, Zerdoumi_2017, Kotler_2018). Fifteen other submitters, including one expert panel (ClinGen TP53 Variant Curation Expert Panel) have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant in ClinVar after 2014, and classified the variant as VUS (n=8), likely benign (n=3) / benign (n=4; including the expert panel). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, SCV002550936.4

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)
#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Nov 3, 2024