U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_006005.3(WFS1):c.1167T>G (p.Asp389Glu) AND not provided

Germline classification:
Uncertain significance (4 submissions)
Last evaluated:
Nov 19, 2023
Review status:
2 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV000199078.28

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_006005.3(WFS1):c.1167T>G (p.Asp389Glu)]

NM_006005.3(WFS1):c.1167T>G (p.Asp389Glu)

Gene:
WFS1:wolframin ER transmembrane glycoprotein [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
4p16.1
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_006005.3(WFS1):c.1167T>G (p.Asp389Glu)
Other names:
p.D389E:GAT>GAG
HGVS:
  • NC_000004.12:g.6300962T>G
  • NG_011700.1:g.36113T>G
  • NM_001145853.1:c.1167T>G
  • NM_006005.3:c.1167T>GMANE SELECT
  • NP_001139325.1:p.Asp389Glu
  • NP_005996.2:p.Asp389Glu
  • LRG_1417t1:c.1167T>G
  • LRG_1417:g.36113T>G
  • LRG_1417p1:p.Asp389Glu
  • NC_000004.11:g.6302689T>G
Protein change:
D389E
Links:
dbSNP: rs201282601
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs201282601
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_001145853.1:c.1167T>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_006005.3:c.1167T>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
Observations:
1

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
none provided
Identifiers:
MedGen: C3661900

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV000252524GeneDx
criteria provided, single submitter

(GeneDx Variant Classification Process June 2021)
Uncertain significance
(Jun 16, 2021)
germlineclinical testing

Citation Link,

SCV001500779CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
criteria provided, single submitter

(CeGaT Center For Human Genetics Tuebingen Variant Classification Criteria Version 2)
Uncertain significance
(Jan 1, 2021)
germlineclinical testing

Citation Link,

SCV001512387Invitae
criteria provided, single submitter

(Invitae Variant Classification Sherloc (09022015))
Uncertain significance
(Nov 19, 2023)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

SCV003823759Revvity Omics, Revvity
criteria provided, single submitter

(ACMG Guidelines, 2015)
Uncertain significance
(Feb 11, 2019)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineyes1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.

Nykamp K, Anderson M, Powers M, Garcia J, Herrera B, Ho YY, Kobayashi Y, Patil N, Thusberg J, Westbrook M; Invitae Clinical Genomics Group., Topper S.

Genet Med. 2017 Oct;19(10):1105-1117. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.37. Epub 2017 May 11. Erratum in: Genet Med. 2020 Jan;22(1):240. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0624-9.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
28492532
PMCID:
PMC5632818

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee..

Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
25741868
PMCID:
PMC4544753

Details of each submission

From GeneDx, SCV000252524.12

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testingnot provided

Description

Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27535533)

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen, SCV001500779.19

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not provided1not providednot providedclinical testingnot provided
#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineyesnot providednot providednot provided1not providednot providednot provided

From Invitae, SCV001512387.4

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

This sequence change replaces aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, with glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 389 of the WFS1 protein (p.Asp389Glu). This variant is present in population databases (rs201282601, gnomAD 0.04%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with WFS1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 215385). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt WFS1 protein function with a negative predictive value of 95%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Revvity Omics, Revvity, SCV003823759.2

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)
#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2024