U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_000527.5(LDLR):c.1024G>A (p.Asp342Asn) AND not provided

Germline classification:
Likely benign (4 submissions)
Review status:
1 star out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, single submitter
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV000162022.18

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_000527.5(LDLR):c.1024G>A (p.Asp342Asn)]

NM_000527.5(LDLR):c.1024G>A (p.Asp342Asn)

Gene:
LDLR:low density lipoprotein receptor [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
19p13.2
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_000527.5(LDLR):c.1024G>A (p.Asp342Asn)
Other names:
NM_000527.5(LDLR):c.1024G>A
HGVS:
  • NC_000019.10:g.11110735G>A
  • NG_009060.1:g.26355G>A
  • NM_000527.5:c.1024G>AMANE SELECT
  • NM_001195798.2:c.1024G>A
  • NM_001195799.2:c.901G>A
  • NM_001195800.2:c.520G>A
  • NM_001195803.2:c.643G>A
  • NP_000518.1:p.Asp342Asn
  • NP_000518.1:p.Asp342Asn
  • NP_001182727.1:p.Asp342Asn
  • NP_001182728.1:p.Asp301Asn
  • NP_001182729.1:p.Asp174Asn
  • NP_001182732.1:p.Asp215Asn
  • LRG_274t1:c.1024G>A
  • LRG_274:g.26355G>A
  • LRG_274p1:p.Asp342Asn
  • NC_000019.9:g.11221411G>A
  • NM_000527.4:c.1024G>A
  • P01130:p.Asp342Asn
  • c.1024G>A
  • p.D342N
Protein change:
D174N
Links:
LDLR-LOVD, British Heart Foundation: LDLR_001326; UniProtKB: P01130#VAR_005366
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_000527.5:c.1024G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001195798.2:c.1024G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001195799.2:c.901G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001195800.2:c.520G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001195803.2:c.643G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
Functional consequence:
no known functional consequence - Comment(s)

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
none provided
Identifiers:
MedGen: C3661900

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV000189625Dept. of Genetics and Pharmacogenomics, Merck Research Labs
no classification provided

(in vitro)
not providednot applicablein vitro

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

SCV005209377Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
criteria provided, single submitter

(ACMG Guidelines, 2015)
Likely benigngermlinenot provided

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing, not provided
not providedunknownyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing
not providednot applicablenot applicablenot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedin vitro

Citations

PubMed

Systematic cell-based phenotyping of missense alleles empowers rare variant association studies: a case for LDLR and myocardial infarction.

Thormaehlen AS, Schuberth C, Won HH, Blattmann P, Joggerst-Thomalla B, Theiss S, Asselta R, Duga S, Merlini PA, Ardissino D, Lander ES, Gabriel S, Rader DJ, Peloso GM, Pepperkok R, Kathiresan S, Runz H.

PLoS Genet. 2015 Feb;11(2):e1004855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004855. Erratum in: PLoS Genet. 2015 Mar 17;11(3):e1005060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005060.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
25647241
PMCID:
PMC4409815

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee..

Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
25741868
PMCID:
PMC4544753

Details of each submission

From Dept. of Genetics and Pharmacogenomics, Merck Research Labs, SCV000189625.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedin vitro PubMed (1)
#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1not applicablenot applicablenot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From GeneDx, SCV000234648.10

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testingnot provided

Description

The D342N variant in the LDLR gene has been reported previously as a pathogenic variant in association with familial hypercholesterolemia, using alternate nomenclature D321N (Day et al., 1997; Fouchier et al., 2001). While 342N was identified in four patients with early-onset myocardial infarction, it was also identified in 10 control individuals of advanced age with no history of myocardial infarction. Additionally, cholesterol and LDL levels were not reported (Do et al., 2015). The NHLBI ESP Exome Sequencing Project reports that D342N was observed in 27/4406 (0.61%) alleles from individuals of African American background, indicating it may be a rare variant in this population. The D342N variant is a semi-conservative amino acid substitution, which may impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in some properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is not conserved across species, and in silico analysis predicts this variant likely does not alter the protein structure/function. In addition, in vitro overexpression and complementation experiments suggest that D342N is non-disruptive to LDLR activity (Thormaehlen et al., 2015). A research group recently concluded that there was no definitive evidence for a genotype/phenotype association of D342N with familial hypercholesterolemia (Amendola et al., 2015; Olfson et al., 2015). We interpret D342N as a variant of uncertain significance.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System - The Canadian Open Genetics Repository (COGR), SCV001552212.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testingnot provided

Description

The LDLR p.Asp301Asn variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs139361635) and in ClinVar (classified benign 2 times, likely benign 2 times, a VUS 4 times and pathogenic once). The variant was also identified in control databases in 168 of 282430 chromosomes (3 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.000595 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 160 of 24944 chromosomes (freq: 0.006414), Latino in 6 of 35432 chromosomes (freq: 0.000169), Other in 1 of 7220 chromosomes (freq: 0.000139) and European (non-Finnish) in 1 of 128970 chromosomes (freq: 0.000008), but not in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish) or South Asian populations. The D301N variant in LDLR has been reported in 4 individuals with possible or definitive hypercholesterolemia (Do_1997_PMID:25487149; Fouchier_2001_PMID:11810272; Sjouke_2015_PMID:24585268; Leigh_2008_PMID:18325082). The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. The p.Asp301 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1unknownyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics, SCV005209377.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providednot provided PubMed (1)
#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Flagged submissions

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV000234648GeneDx
flagged submission
Reason: Conflicts with expert reviewed submission without evidence to support different classification
Notes: None

(GeneDx Variant Classification (06012015))
Uncertain significance
(Feb 4, 2016)
germlineclinical testing

Citation Link,

SCV001552212Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System - The Canadian Open Genetics Repository (COGR)

See additional submitters

flagged submission
Reason: Conflicts with expert reviewed submission without evidence to support different classification
Notes: None
Uncertain significanceunknownclinical testing

Last Updated: Oct 26, 2024