Description
This variant is denoted MLH1 c.677G>T at the cDNA level. Located in the last nucleotide of exon 8, it destroys a natural splice site and causes abnormal splicing. Multiple studies report, but do not quantify, aberrant splicing caused by this variant that results in skipping of exon 8 (Maliaka 1996, Kurzawski 2006, Hardt 2011). This is concordant with multiple protein and RNA analyses of an alternate variant at this position, MLH1 c.677G>A, which have consistently demonstrated that it causes complete skipping of exon 8 (Leung 1998, Sharp 2004, Pagenstecher 2006, Tournier 2008). In addition, in vitro functional assays of MLH1 c.677G>T showed reduced mismatch repair activity and possibly reduced protein expression (Takahashi 2007). MLH1 c.677G>T has been observed in multiple individuals with early-onset colorectal, endometrial, or gastric cancer whose family histories fulfilled Bethesda or Amsterdam Criteria for Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer, but also in a sporadic gastric tumor (Maliaka 1996, Evans 2001, Kurzawski 2002, Bartosova 2003, Wagner 2003, Kurzawski 2006, Zavodna 2006, Alemayehu 2008, Hardt 2011, Schofield 2012, Raskin 2017, Martin-Morales 2018). Tumor testing in many of these individuals showed microsatellite instability and loss of MLH1 protein expression, and Bujalkova et al. (2008) found tumoral loss of heterozygosity. In addition, MLH1 c. 677G>T co-occurred with two other pathogenic variants, one in BRCA2 and one in MSH6, in an individual with early-onset endometrial cancer and bilinear family history (Gong 2012). Although the nucleotide substitution results in the change of an Arginine to a Leucine at codon 226, and is called Arg226Leu in the literature, we are using only the nucleotide nomenclature to refer to the variant since the defect is determined to be one of splicing rather than a resulting missense variant. MLH1 c.677G>T was not observed in large population cohorts (Lek 2016). The nucleotide which is altered, a guanine (G) at base 677, is conserved across species. Based on the current evidence, we consider this variant to be pathogenic.
# | Sample | Method | Observation |
---|
Origin | Affected | Number tested | Tissue | Purpose | Method | Individuals | Allele frequency | Families | Co-occurrences |
---|
1 | germline | yes | not provided | not provided | not provided | | not provided | not provided | not provided | not provided |