Suggestive Findings
Acute infantile Tay-Sachs disease should be suspected in infants with the following clinical findings:
Progressive weakness and loss of motor skills beginning between ages three and six months
Decreased attentiveness
An increased or exaggerated startle response
A cherry-red spot of the fovea centralis of the macula of the retina
A normal-sized liver and spleen
Generalized muscular hypotonia with sustained ankle clonus and hyperreflexia
Onset of seizures beginning around age 12 months
Progressive macrocephaly with proportionate ventricular enlargement on neuroimaging beginning at age 18 months
Subacute juvenile Tay-Sachs disease should be suspected in individuals with the following clinical findings:
A period of normal development until ages two to five years followed by a plateauing of skills and then loss of previously acquired developmental skills
Progressive spasticity resulting in loss of independent ambulation
Progressive dysarthria, drooling, and eventually absent speech
Normal-sized liver and spleen
Onset of seizures
Late-onset Tay-Sachs disease should be suspected in individuals with the following clinical findings:
Onset of symptoms in teens or adulthood
Progressive neurogenic weakness of antigravity muscles in the lower extremities and frequent falls
Dysarthria, tremor, and incoordination
Acute psychiatric manifestations including psychosis (which can be the initial manifestation of disease)
Isolated cerebellar atrophy on neuroimaging
Establishing the Diagnosis
The diagnosis of a HEXA disorder is established in a proband with abnormally low HEX A activity on enzyme testing and biallelic pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variants in HEXA identified by molecular genetic testing (see Table 1).
Note: (1) Per ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variant" and "likely pathogenic variant" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in this GeneReview is understood to include any likely pathogenic variants. (2) Identification of a heterozygous HEXA variant of uncertain significance does not establish or rule out the diagnosis.
HEX A enzymatic activity testing. Testing identifies absent to near-absent HEX A enzymatic activity in the serum, white blood cells, or other tissues in the presence of normal or elevated activity of the beta-hexosaminidase B (HEX B) enzyme [Hall et al 2014].
Note: The enzyme HEX A is a heterodimer of one alpha subunit and one beta subunit (encoded by the genes HEXA and HEXB, respectively); the enzyme HEX B, on the other hand, is a homodimer composed of two beta subunits. Only HEX A is able to degrade GM2 ganglioside.
Note: Pseudodeficiency refers to an in vitro phenomenon caused by specific HEXA variants that renders the enzyme unable to process the synthetic (but not the natural) GM2 substrates, and leads to false positive enzyme testing results.
Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination of gene-targeted testing (single-gene testing, multigene panel) and comprehensive
genomic testing (exome sequencing, exome array, genome sequencing) depending on the phenotype.
Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine which gene(s) are likely involved, whereas genomic testing does not. Because the phenotype of HEXA disorders is broad, infants with the distinctive findings described in Suggestive Findings are likely to be diagnosed using gene-targeted testing (see Option 1), whereas those (especially older individuals) with a phenotype indistinguishable from many other disorders presenting later in life with neurodegeneration or developmental regression are more likely to be diagnosed using comprehensive genomic testing (see Option 2).
Option 1
When the phenotypic and laboratory findings suggest the diagnosis of a HEXA disorder, molecular genetic testing approaches can include single-gene testing or use of a multigene panel:
Single-gene testing. Sequence analysis of HEXA is performed first followed by gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis if only one or no pathogenic variant is found.
Targeted analysis for pathogenic variants can be performed first in individuals of specific ethnicity:
A multigene panel that includes
HEXA and other genes of interest (see
Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this
GeneReview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.
For this disorder, a multigene panel that also includes deletion/duplication analysis is recommended (see
Table 1).
For an introduction to multigene panels click
here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found
here.
Option 2
When the phenotype is indistinguishable from many other inherited disorders characterized by a slowly progressive neurodegeneration, comprehensive
genomic testing, which does not require the clinician to determine which gene(s) are likely involved, is the best option. Exome sequencing is most commonly used; genome sequencing is also possible.
If exome sequencing is not diagnostic, exome array (when clinically available) may be considered to detect (multi)exon deletions or duplications that cannot be detected by exome sequence analysis.
For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.
Table 1.
Molecular Genetic Testing Used in HEXA Disorders
View in own window
Gene 1 | Method | Proportion of Pathogenic Variants 2 Detectable by Method |
---|
HEXA
| Sequence analysis 3 | 99% 4 |
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 5 | Rare |
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include missense, nonsense, and splice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.
- 4.
Data derived from the subscription-based professional view of Human Gene Mutation Database [Stenson et al 2020]
- 5.
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include a range of techniques such as quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications.