Table 7Summary GRADE table (Therapeutic playgroups vs care as usual)

OutcomeSample sizeEffect size (95% CI)QualityInterpretation of effecta
Change in foster parent-rated social competence at 2 weeks follow up (Child Behavior Checklist)20MD 1.53 (0.63 to 2.43)Very LowEffect favours intervention group
Change in foster parent-rated externalising behaviours at 2 weeks follow up (Child Behavior Checklist)20MD −2.20 (−5.59 to 1.19)Very LowCould not differentiate
Foster parent-rated internalising behaviours at 2 weeks follow up (Child Behavior Checklist)20MD 1.30 (−2.52 to 5.12)Very LowCould not differentiate
Teacher-rated social problems at 1 month following the start of school (Teacher Report Form)20MD 0.00 (−2.72 to 2.72)Very LowCould not differentiate
Teacher-rated externalising behaviours at 1 month following the start of school (Teacher Report Form)20MD 0.90 (−7.12 to 8.92)Very LowCould not differentiate
Teacher-rated internalising behaviours at 1 month following the start of school (Teacher Report Form)20MD 0.10 (−6.71 to 6.91)Very LowCould not differentiate
Foster parent-rated emotional regulation at 2 weeks follow up (Emotion Regulation Checklist)20MD −0.03 (−0.20 to 0.14)Very LowCould not differentiate
Foster parent-rated emotional lability at 2 weeks follow up (Emotion Regulation Checklist)20MD −0.14 (−0.34 to 0.06)Very LowCould not differentiate
Assessor-rated emotional lability at 2 weeks follow up (Emotion Regulation Checklist)20MD −0.41 (−0.65 to −0.17)Very LowEffect favours intervention group, but it may be less than the MID
Teacher-rated emotional regulation at 1 month following the start of school (Emotion Regulation Checklist)20MD −0.18 (−0.69 to 0.33)Very LowCould not differentiate
Teacher-rated emotional lability at 1 month following the start of school (Emotion Regulation Checklist)20MD 0.22 (−0.26 to 0.70)Very LowCould not differentiate
(a)

No meaningful difference: crosses line of no effect but not line of MID; Could not differentiate: crosses line of no effect and line of MID; May favour: confidence intervals do not cross line of no effect but cross MID; Favours: confidence intervals do not cross line of no effect or MID

From: Interventions to support readiness for school in looked-after children and young people

Cover of Interventions to support readiness for school in looked-after children and young people
Interventions to support readiness for school in looked-after children and young people: Looked-After Children and Young People: Evidence review H.
NICE Guideline, No. 205.
Copyright © NICE 2021.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.