Table 3Summary GRADE table (Attachment and biobehavioural catch-up for infants (ABC-I) vs Developmental Education for Families (DEF))

OutcomeSample sizeEffect size (95% CI)QualityInterpretation of effecta
Receptive language score at 3 years of age (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test)52MD 9.97 (1.58 to 18.36)Very LowEffect favours intervention group, but it may be less than the MID
Association between being in the intervention group and receptive language score at 3 years of age (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test)52β 9.39 (0.82 to 17.96)Very lowIntervention was associated with a more favourable outcome
(a)

No meaningful difference: crosses line of no effect but not line of MID; Could not differentiate: crosses line of no effect and line of MID; May favour: confidence intervals do not cross line of no effect but cross MID; Favours: confidence intervals do not cross line of no effect or MID

From: Interventions to support readiness for school in looked-after children and young people

Cover of Interventions to support readiness for school in looked-after children and young people
Interventions to support readiness for school in looked-after children and young people: Looked-After Children and Young People: Evidence review H.
NICE Guideline, No. 205.
Copyright © NICE 2021.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.