Table 103Description of sensitivity analysis, immunomodulatory agents

Analysis, parameter(s) to be changedDefault parameter valueValue testedRationale
1 FEV1% utility valuesNovartis analyses of Bradley 2010Solem 2014:
FEV1%>70, 0.949
FEV1% 40–70, 0.918
FEV1% < 40%, 0.881
Solem 2014 is a larger and more recent RCT that used data from a 48-week, Phase 3, multicentre study (STRIVE) to evaluate the relationship between EQ5D measures and FEV1% in 161 participants with CF. Solem 2014 was also used to inform a recent NICE TA398.
2 Azithromycin exacerbation dataRRHRThe committee regarded the time to next exacerbation for azithromycin (expressed as a HR) as more reliable than the rate of exacerbations, particularly as the study reporting this outcome was of a higher quality than those used to estimate the rate of exacerbations.
3 Exacerbation cost£6,827£1,220The cost used to inform the models developed for NICE TA276 based on asthma complications was a lot cheaper than the cost estimated from Thornton 2005.
4 Number of baseline exacerbations reduced2.20/year inferred from the number of days in hospital and number of days on home IV antibiotics1.27/year inferred from the number of days in hospitalNot all home IV antibiotic treatment may relate to exacerbation treatment, so hospital treatment alone should be explored to assess the impact any potential inaccuracy.
5 Ibuprofen preparationTabletsOral solutionThe best price available to the NHS is used to inform the base case, but more expensive preparations are available (NICE 2013 Guides to the methods of technology appraisal).
6 Prednisolone preparationTabletsOral solutionThe best price available to the NHS is used to inform the base case, but more expensive preparations are available (NICE 2013 Guides to the methods of technology appraisal).
7 Probability of ibuprofen TRAEsAbdominal bleed 0.7%
Renal impairment 0.7%
Probabilities doubledThe committee stated the risk of abdominal bleeds and renal impairments related to long-term ibuprofen use could be higher.
8 No TRAE Table 93 0%To assess the impact of TRAEs
9 Within-trial (time horizon reduced to minimise extrapolation)Lifetime (60 years)2 cycles from age 12There is considerable uncertainty surrounding the extrapolation of trial data to a lifetime horizon.
10 Exacerbation cost and disutility (minor)£6,827 and −0.095£1,220 and −0.015This scenario would be less favourable to the more effective treatments. If those treatments are still cost-effective, we can have greater confidence in the decision.
11 RR for azithromycin0.440.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1 over a lifetime horizonPotentially unreliable studies were included in the NMA, particularly for azithromycin. This analysis will determine the rate of exacerbations required to change our decision regarding the cost-effectiveness of azithromycin.

CF, cystic fibrosis; FEV, forced expiratory volume; HR, hazard ratio, IV, intravenous; RCT, randomised controlled trial; RR, rate ratio; TA, technology appraisal; TRAE, treatment related adverse effect

From: Appendix K, Health Economics

Cover of Cystic Fibrosis
Cystic Fibrosis: Diagnosis and management.
NICE Guideline, No. 78.
National Guideline Alliance (UK).
Copyright © NICE 2017.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.