Table 189Summary clinical evidence profile: Comparison 6. Cohort segregation versus no cohort segregation

Inpatient/outpatient care: Comparison 6. Cohort segregation versus no cohort segregation
OutcomesIllustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)Relative effect (95% CI)No of Participants (studies)Quality of the evidence (GRADE)Comments
Assumed riskCorresponding risk
ControlCohort segregation into pathogens
Monthly incidence of multiply resistant P aeruginosa strain
Follow-up: 1 month
206 per 100065 per 1000
(25 to 161)
OR 0.27
(0.1 to 0.74)
119
(Hoiby & Pedersen 1989)2
⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1
Annual incidence of intermittent P aeruginosa
Follow-up: 1 year
333 per 1000225 per 1000
(99 to 433)
OR 0.58
(0.22 to 1.53)
Total N unclear
(Frederiksen 1999) 5
⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low3,4
Annual incidence of chronic P aeruginosa
Follow-up: 1 year
200 per 1000101 per 1000
(41 to 229)
OR 0.45
(0.17 to 1.19)
Total N unclear
(Frederiksen 1999)5
⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low3,6
6-month incidence B cepacia
Follow-up: 6 months
46 per 100011 per 1000
(1 to 87)
OR 0.23
(0.03 to 1.97)
115
(Whiteford 1995)8
⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low4,7
Annual incidence of Burkholderia species infection (percentages)
Follow-up: 1 year
3–5%16.3%Not estimableN not reported (France)11⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low9,10
Monthly prevalence of multiple resistant P aeruginosa strain (percentages)
Follow-up: 1 month
328 per 1000332 per 1000
(226 to 462)
OR 1.02
(0.60 to 176)
119
(Hoiby 1989)2
⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,4
Prevalence of AES-1 (P aeruginosa epidemic strain)
Follow-up: 2 years
--aRR 0.64
(0.47 to 0.87)
Total N unclear
(Griffiths 2005)12
⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low6
Annual prevalence of chronic P aeruginosa infection
Follow-up: 1 year
722 per 1000807 per 1000
(728 to 867)
OR 1.61
(1.03 to 2.51)
Total N unclear
(Jones 2005)13
⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low6
Annual prevalence of transmissible P aeruginosa infection
Follow-up: 1 year
130 per 1000154 per 1000
(96 to 237)
OR 1.22
(0.71 to 2.08)
Total N unclear
(Jones 2005) 13
⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low4
Annual prevalence of chronic infection with transmissible P aeruginosa strain (percentages)
Follow-up: 1 year
13%15.4%Not estimableTotal N unclear
(Jones 2005)13
⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low10
*

The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

Abbreviations: adjRR: adjusted risk ratio; ASUSP-1: Australian epidemic strain, type 1; CI: confidence interval; MRSA: methicillin-resistant S aureus; OR: odds ratio

1

The quality of the evidence was downgraded by 1 because of high risk of bias in relation to comparability of the groups, and outcome reporting

2

Intervention group: data from May 1983; comparison group: data from March 1983. Intervention implemented in April 1983.

3

The quality of the evidence was downgraded by 1 because of high risk of bias in relation to comparability between groups, and outcome assessment

4

The quality of the evidence was downgraded by 2 because the 95% CI crossed 2 default MIDs

5

Intervention group: data from 1982; comparison group: data from 1980. Intervention implemented in 1981

6

The quality of the evidence was downgraded by 1 because the 95% CI crossed 1 default MID

7

The quality of the evidence was downgraded by 2 because of high risk of bias in relation to the comparability between groups, outcome assessment and unclear sample selection

8

Intervention group: data from December 1992; comparison group: data from May 1992. Intervention implemented in June 1992.

9

The quality of the evidence was downgraded by 2 because of high risk of bias in relation to sample selection, comparability between groups and outcome assessment

10

Imprecision cannot be calculated with the data reported

11

Intervention group: data from 1992; comparison group: data from 1983–1990. Intervention implemented in November 1991. Intervention was incomplete cohort segregation.

12

Intervention group: data from 2002; comparison group: data from 1999. Intervention implemented in January 2000.

13

Intervention group: data from 2001; comparison group: data from 1999. Intervention implemented in 2000.

From: 11, Prevention of cross infection

Cover of Cystic Fibrosis
Cystic Fibrosis: Diagnosis and management.
NICE Guideline, No. 78.
National Guideline Alliance (UK).
Copyright © NICE 2017.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.