Table 3.49. Relative risks for ulcerative colitis among former and current smokers, case-control and cohort studies

StudyNumber
of cases
Time in
relation to diagnosis
Relative risk (95% confidence interval) *
Former smokersCurrent smokers
Case-control
Harries et al. 1982 230A ** Increased riskDecreased risk
Jick and Walker 1983 239A1.2 (0.8-1.8)0.3 (0.2-0.4)
Gyde et al. 1984 74
31
A
A
Decreased risk§
Decreased risk§
Decreased risk >§<§
Decreased risk >§<§
Logan et al. 1984 ¶¶ 120
64
D***
D
NR§§§
NR
Decreased risk¶¶¶
Decreased risk¶¶¶
Thornton et al. 1985 30DIncreased risk >§<§ Decreased risk >§<§
Burns 1986 63AIncreased risk >§<§ Decreased risk¶¶¶
Benoni and Nilsson 1987 ¶¶ 173
80
D
D
1.6
1.8
0.3 >§<§
0.3 >§<§
Boyko et al. 1987 ¶¶ 212D1.9 (1.1-3.5)0.6 (0.4-1.0)
Franceschi et al. 1987 124
49
D
D
2.7 (1.5-4.9)
2.6 (1.0-7.2)
0.5 (0.3-1.0)
1.1 (0.4-2.2)
Tobin et al. 1987 143
81
D
D
1.5 (0.8-2.8)
NR
0.2 (0.1-0.3)¶¶¶
Decreased risk
Lindberg et al. 1988 ¶¶ 258D2.3 (1.4-3.9)0.7 (0.4-1.0)
Lorusso et al. 1989 84D3.0 (0.9-10.3)Decreased risk¶¶¶
Persson et al. 1990 ¶¶ 145
63
D
D
2.2 (0.9-5.0)
1.6 (0.6-4.2)
0.8 (0.5-1.3)
0.7 (0.4-1.0)
Samuelsson et al. 1991 167A1.1 (0.6-2.3)0.5 (0.3-0.9)
Epidemiology Group of the
Research Committee of
Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Japan 1994
76D2.4 (1.0-6.0)0.7 (0.2-2.0) ****
Case-control(continued)
Nakamura and Labarthe 1994;
Nakamura et al. 1994
384
199
D1.7 (1.0-2.9)
2.3 (0.9-5.7)
0.3 (0.2-0.5)
0.4 (0.2-1.0)
Rutgeerts et al. 1994 174ANRDecreased risk¶¶¶
Silverstein et al. 1994 100D1.2 (0.5-3.0)0.1 (0.1-0.4)
Reif et al. 1995 54ANo differenceNo difference
Corrao et al. 1998 594D3.0 (2.1-4.3)0.9 (0.7-1.2)
Cohort
Vessey et al. 1986 24 DIncreased riskDecreased risk¶¶¶
Logan and Kay 1989 78DNRDecreased risk¶¶¶
*

Compared with those who never smoked, unless otherwise indicated.

**

A = Smoking status ascertained after diagnosis.

§

Statistically significant differences in relative risk by smoking status, p < 0.05.

>§<§

Percentage of smokers differed significantly between cases and controls; p < 0.05.

Number of women.

¶¶

Population-based study.

***

D = Smoking status ascertained before or soon after diagnosis.

§§§

NR = Not reported.

¶¶¶

Compared with former smokers and those who never smoked.

****

>20 cigarettes/day.

From: Chapter 3. Health Consequences of Tobacco Use Among Women

Cover of Women and Smoking
Women and Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General.
Office on Smoking and Health (US).

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.