Table 3.33. Relative risks for conception delay among women smokers

StudyStudy typePopulationStudy periodEnd pointSmoking statusRelative risk (95% confidence interval)Adjustment factors
Linn et al. 1982 Survey on deliveries3,214 married nondiabetic women who gave birth after planned pregnancy United States1977-1979Relative risk for conception delay > 3 monthsNonsmokers
Smokers
1.0
1.0 (0.9-1.2)
Maternal: contraception use, age, history of spontaneous abortion, use of diethylstilbestrol (DES) by woman's mother, body mass index, marijuana use, age at menarche, race, religion, history of pelvic inflammatory disease, history of induced abortion or ectopic pregnancy, gravidity, education, welfare status
Olsen et al. 1983 Case-controlCases: 228 women attempting first pregnancy for >1 year Controls: 1,400 parous women who achieved first pregnancy in <1 year Denmark1977-1980Relative risk for conception delay > 12 months (first pregnancy)Nonsmokers
Smokers
1.0
1.8 (1.3-2.5)
Maternal: age, education, parity, oral contraceptive use, alcohol consumption, residence
Cases: 195 parous women attempting pregnancy for > 1 year Controls: 1,800 parous women who achieved pregnancy in <1 year DenmarkRelative risk for conception delay > 12 months (second or later pregnancy)Nonsmokers
Smokers
1.0
1.3 (1.0-1.8)
Suonio et al. 1990 Survey of pregnant women2,198 pregnant women who conceived in < 12 months
Finland
1983Relative risk for conception delay > 6 monthsNonsmokers
Smokers
1.0
1.5 (1.3-1.8)
Maternal: age, gravidity, spontaneous abortion, induced abortion, maternal alcohol consumption, occupation, working time, strain of work Paternal: smoking, alcohol consumption
Olsen 1991 Survey10,886 pregnant women Denmark1984-1987Relative risk for conception delay >12 monthsSmokersMaternal: number of pregnancies, education, shift work, age, alcohol intake, coffee intake Paternal: age, smoking
1-4 cigarettes/day1.0
5-9 cigarettes/day1.8 (1.3-2.6)
10-14 cigarettes/day1.8 (1.3-2.6)
15-19 cigarettes/day1.8 (1.2-2.5)
> 20 cigarettes/day1.7 (1.2-2.5)
Laurent et al. 1992 Case-controlCases: 483 women with history of conception delay > 24 months
Controls: 2,231 women without conception delay > 24 months
United States
1980-1983Relative risk for conception delay > 24 monthsNonsmokers1.0Maternal: age, age at first sexual intercourse, education, ethnicity, history of benign ovarian disease
Smokers
1-4 cigarettes/day1.0 (1.0-1.0)
5-9 cigarettes/day1.1 (1.0-1.1)
10-19 cigarettes/day1.2 (1.1-1.3)
> 20 cigarettes/day1.4 (1.1-1.6)
Bolumar et al. 1996 Population survey of pregnancy history3,187 women with planned pregnancy
Europe
1991-1993Relative risk for conception delay >9.5 months for first pregnancyNonsmokers1.0Maternal: age, education, recent oral contraceptive use, frequency of sexual intercourse, paid work, alcohol consumption, coffee consumption
Smokers
1.4 (1.1-1.7)1-10 cigarettes/day
> 11 cigarettes/day1.7 (1.3-2.1)
Prenatal survey2,587 pregnant women with planned pregnancy Europe1991-1993Relative risk for conception delay >9.5 months for first pregnancyNonsmokers1.0
Smokers
1-10 cigarettes/day1.4 (1.0-1.8)
> 11 cigarettes/day1.7 (1.3-2.3)
Hull et al. 2000 Population-based survey14,182 pregnant women who reached 24 weeks' gestation
England
1991-1992Relative risk for conception delay of >6 months * NonsmokersMaternal: age, education, duration of oral contraceptive use, alcohol consumption, housing tenure and type, overcrowding
Paternal: age, education, alcohol consumption
Smokers
1-4 cigarettes/day1.0
5-9 cigarettes/day1.2 (0.9-1.6)
10-14 cigarettes/day1.2 (0.9-11.6)
15-19 cigarettes/day1.5 (1.2-1.9)
> 20 cigarettes/day1.6 (1.3-2.0)

Note: Relative risk for conception delay compares risks of waiting longer than a specified time; values >1.0 indicate impairment of fecundity.

*

Conception delay of >12 months was also examined, and results were similar.

From: Chapter 3. Health Consequences of Tobacco Use Among Women

Cover of Women and Smoking
Women and Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General.
Office on Smoking and Health (US).

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.