Table GCaregiver-level interventions: evidence summary

Intervention Versus ComparisonOutcomeEvidence Summary
Knowledge-skills vs. no treatment, wait-list, or information control
Guerra, 201170
Ostwald, 199989
Care recipient agitation/aggressionInsufficient – no data
Care recipient general behavior
k = 2; n = 140
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, imprecise)
Care recipient distress/QoL
k = 1; n = 56
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, indirect, imprecise, unknown consistency)
Care recipient psychoactive medicationInsufficient – no data
Care recipient nursing home admissionInsufficient – no data
Caregiver burden
k = 2; n = 140
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, indirect, imprecise)
Caregiver distress/QoL
k = 1; n = 56
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, indirect, imprecise, unknown consistency)
Caregiver behavior
k = 1; n = 84
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, imprecise, unknown consistency)
Knowledge-affect vs. attention control
Chien, 200871
Care recipient agitation/aggressionInsufficient – no data
Care recipient general behavior
k = 1; n = 88
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, imprecise, unknown consistency)
Care recipient distress/QoLInsufficient – no data
Care recipient psychoactive medicationInsufficient – no data
Care recipient nursing home admissionInsufficient – no data
Caregiver burden
k = 1; n = 88
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, indirect, imprecise, unknown consistency)
Caregiver distress/QoL
k = 1; n = 88
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, indirect, imprecise, unknown consistency)
Caregiver behaviorInsufficient – no data
Skills-knowledge vs. wait-list, usual care, or information control
De Rotrou, 201173
Klodnicka, 201172
Gallagher-Thompson, 201074
Ulstein, 200775
Gitlin, 200376
Care recipient agitation/aggressionInsufficient – no data
Care recipient general behavior
k = 5; n = 657
Skills-knowledge interventions similar to no treatment on care recipient general behavior (low-strength evidence, moderate risk of bias, imprecise)
Care recipient distress/QoLInsufficient – no data
Care recipient psychoactive drug useInsufficient – no data
Care recipient nursing home admissionInsufficient – no data
Caregiver burden
k = 2; n = 337
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, indirect, imprecise)
Caregiver distress/QoLInsufficient – no data
Caregiver behavior
k = 1; n = 190
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, imprecise, unknown consistency)
Skills-knowledge vs. haloperidol
Teri, 200077
Care recipient agitation/aggression
k = 1; n = 75
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, imprecise, unknown consistency)
Care recipient general behavior
k = 1; n = 75
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, imprecise, unknown consistency)
Care recipient distress/QoLInsufficient – no data
Care recipient psychoactive drug useInsufficient – no data
Care recipient nursing home admissionInsufficient – no data
Caregiver burden
k = 1; n = 75
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, indirect, imprecise)
Caregiver distress/QoL
k = 1; n = 75
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, indirect, imprecise)
Caregiver behaviorInsufficient – no data
Skills-knowledge vs. placebo
Teri, 200077
Care recipient agitation/aggression
k = 1; n = 75
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, imprecise)
Care recipient general behavior
k = 1; n = 75
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, imprecise)
Care recipient distress/QoLInsufficient – no data
Care recipient psychoactive drug useInsufficient – no data
Care recipient nursing home admissionInsufficient – no data
Caregiver burden
k = 1; n = 75
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, indirect, imprecise)
Caregiver distress/QoL
k = 1; n = 75
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, indirect, imprecise)
Caregiver behaviorInsufficient – no data
Skills-behavior vs. wait-list or information control
Gitlin, 200882
Gonzalez, 201478
Marriott, 200086
Care recipient agitation/aggression
k = 1; n = 56
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, imprecise)
Care recipient general behavior
k = 2; n = 144
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, imprecise, inconsistent)
Care recipient distress/QoLInsufficient – no data
Care recipient psychoactive drug useInsufficient – no data
Care recipient nursing home admissionInsufficient – no data
Caregiver burden
k = 2; n = 158
Skills-behavior interventions similar to no treatment on caregiver burden (low-strength evidence, moderate risk of bias, indirect)
Caregiver distress/QoL
k = 1; n = 56
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, unknown consistency)
Caregiver behavior
k = 1; n = 56
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, unknown consistency)
Skills-behavior vs. attention control
Gitlin, 201081
Huang, 201379
Gitlin, 201080
Gerdner, 200283
Marriot, 200086
Care recipient agitation/aggression
k = 3; n = 575
Skills-behavior interventions similar to attention control on care recipient agitation/aggression (low-strength evidence, moderate risk of bias, imprecise)
Care recipient general behavior
k = 1; n = 102
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, imprecise, inconsistent)
Care recipient distress/QoL
k = 1; n = 209
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, indirect, imprecise, unknown consistency)
Care recipient psychoactive medicationInsufficient – no data
Care recipient nursing home admissionInsufficient – no data
Caregiver burden
k = 2; n = 448
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, indirect, imprecise, unknown consistency)
Caregiver distress
k = 3; n = 685
Skills-behavior interventions improve caregiver distress more than attention control (moderate-strength evidence, moderate risk of bias)
Caregiver behavior
k = 1; n = 239
Skills-behavior interventions improve caregiver confidence more than attention control (moderate-strength evidence, moderate risk of bias)
Skills-behavior vs. sham treatment
Gormley, 200185
Bourgeois, 200284
Patient agitation/aggression
k = 2; n = 125
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, imprecise)
Care recipient general behavior
k = 2; n = 125
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, imprecise)
Care recipient distress/QoLInsufficient – no data
Care recipient taking psychotropic medication
k = 1; n = 62
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, indirect, imprecise, unknown consistency)
Care recipient nursing home admissionInsufficient – no data
Caregiver burden
k = 1; n = 62
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, indirect, imprecise, unknown consistency)
Caregiver distress/QoLInsufficient – no data
Caregiver behaviorInsufficient – no data
Skills-affect
Belle, 200687
Mittelman, 200488
Care recipient agitation/aggressionInsufficient – no data
Care recipient general behavior
k = 2; n = 924
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, imprecise, inconsistent)
Care recipient distress/QoLInsufficient – no data
Care recipient psychoactive drug useInsufficient – no data
Care recipient nursing home admission
k = 1; n = 518
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, imprecise, inconsistent)
Caregiver burden
k = 1; n = 518
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, imprecise, inconsistent)
Caregiver distress/QoL
k = 1; n = 406
Insufficient – no conclusions drawn (moderate risk of bias, imprecise, unknown consistency)
Caregiver behaviorInsufficient – no data

k = total trials; n = total dyads; QoL = quality of life

From: Executive Summary

Cover of Nonpharmacologic Interventions for Agitation and Aggression in Dementia
Nonpharmacologic Interventions for Agitation and Aggression in Dementia [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 177.
Brasure M, Jutkowitz E, Fuchs E, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.