TABLE 29

Summary of control, autonomy and choice and a content validation of the EQ-5D, SF-36 and ICECAP-A

SubthemeSummary descriptionEQ-5DSF-36ICECAP-A
Dependence and independenceSupport was valued and seen as important for QoL. Indeed, those in more severe conditions aspired to more support and accepted they could not be independent

However, support can make people feel dependent and this can be associated with loss of control and esteem. Concerns about loss of independence expressed by those with less severe conditions and/or physical comorbidity

In review, discussed importance of personal autonomy to find the right balance between support and independence. Autonomy does not imply independence
Being independent (‘I am able to be independent . . .’) – but does not deal with need for support
ControlSelf-control: mainly related to relief and management of symptoms, usually through medication. Anxiety and panic associated with fear of loss of control, and depression with lack of control

Environment control: there was a desire to control the environment in order to feel safer. Can involve withdrawing into a smaller world – into a comfort zone
Feeling settled and secure
ChoiceHaving choice and opportunity is important for QoL. Participants usually associate this with money and access to resources which enable someone to do the things they want to do (capabilities theory). To get money, need opportunities to do paid work; these are limited by perceived discrimination and stress from work (so some did voluntary work)

QoL, quality of life.

From: Chapter 6, A qualitative analysis of interviews with mental health service users

Cover of A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures
A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures.
Health Technology Assessment, No. 18.34.
Brazier J, Connell J, Papaioannou D, et al.
Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2014 May.
Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2014. This work was produced by Brazier et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.

Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.