Table 7.

Risks to Sibs of a Proband with Angelman Syndrome by Genetic Mechanism and Parental Genetic Status

Molecular Class 1FamiliesGenetic Mechanism in ProbandRecommended Parental TestingRisk to Sibs
Ia65%-75%5- to 7-Mb 15q11.2-q13 deletionMother: chromosome & FISH analyses<1% if maternal chromosome & FISH analyses are normal 2
Ib<1%Unbalanced chromosome translocation or inherited small interstitial deletion in 15q11.2-q13 regionMother: chromosome & FISH analyses
  • <1% if maternal chromosome studies are normal
  • Possibly as high as 50% if the mother has a chromosome rearrangement 3
IIa3%-7%Paternal UPD (w/normal karyotype)Mother & father: chromosome analysis
  • <1% if both parents have normal chromosome analyses 4 (Recurrence risk ≠ 0, as recurrent meiotic nondisjunction of maternal chromosome 15 has been observed. 5)
  • Approaches 100% if father has a 15;15 Robertsonian translocation
IIb<1%Paternal UPD (w/predisposing parental translocation)
IIIa0.3%Imprinting defect w/ deletion in the ICMother: targeted testing for the IC deletion (a phenotypically normal mother may have a de novo IC deletion on her paternally derived chromosome 15 or a paternally inherited IC deletion 6)
IIIb2.5%-3%Imprinting defect w/o a deletion in the IC<1% (to date, recurrence of AS in families of probands who have an imprinting defect w/o a deletion in the IC has not been reported) 7
IV11%UBE3A pathogenic variantMother: targeted testing for the UBE3A pathogenic variant
V10%"Other" - no identifiable molecular abnormalityNAUndetermined risk

IC = imprinting center; NA = not applicable; UPD = uniparental disomy

1.

Based on terminology by Jiang et al [1999]

2.

Maternal germline mosaicism for large 15q11.2-q13 deletions has been reported [Sánchez et al 2014, Tang et al 2019].

3.
4.

Risk figure is based on the lack of recurrence among all known cases of UPD in AS with normal chromosomes, the experience with UPD in other disorders, & theoretic consideration regarding the mechanism of UPD.

5.
6.

Theoretically, the mother could have germline mosaicism for the imprinting center deletion; to the authors' knowledge, this has not yet been reported.

7.

There is a single report of a pair of sibs with AS who had a 1-1.5-Mb inversion separating the two imprinting center elements, but no imprinting center deletion [Buiting et al 2001, Williams et al 2010]

8.

Maternal somatic/germline mosaicism for a UBE3A pathogenic variant has been reported [Hosoki et al 2005].

From: Angelman Syndrome

Cover of GeneReviews®
GeneReviews® [Internet].
Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors.
Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2024.
Copyright © 1993-2024, University of Washington, Seattle. GeneReviews is a registered trademark of the University of Washington, Seattle. All rights reserved.

GeneReviews® chapters are owned by the University of Washington. Permission is hereby granted to reproduce, distribute, and translate copies of content materials for noncommercial research purposes only, provided that (i) credit for source (http://www.genereviews.org/) and copyright (© 1993-2024 University of Washington) are included with each copy; (ii) a link to the original material is provided whenever the material is published elsewhere on the Web; and (iii) reproducers, distributors, and/or translators comply with the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer. No further modifications are allowed. For clarity, excerpts of GeneReviews chapters for use in lab reports and clinic notes are a permitted use.

For more information, see the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer.

For questions regarding permissions or whether a specified use is allowed, contact: ude.wu@tssamda.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.