An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
com in Drosophila melanogasterNeurospora crassa OR74AEscherichia phage D108All 6 Gene records
Endotext [Internet].
Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, et al., editors.
South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000-.
Top results in this bookTable of Contents
Rising to the Challenge: U.S. Innovation Policy for the Global Economy.
National Research Council (US) Committee on Comparative National Innovation Policies: Best Practice for the 21st Century; Wessner CW, Wolff AW, editors.
Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2012.
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet].
Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006 Feb-.
Medical Terminology [Internet]. 2nd edition.
Open Resources for Nursing (Open RN); Ernstmeyer K, Christman E, editors.
Eau Claire (WI): Chippewa Valley Technical College; 2024.
An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program at the National Institutes of Health.
National Research Council (US) Committee for Capitalizing on Science, Technology, and Innovation: An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program; Wessner CW, editor.
Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2009.
Contemporary Bioethics: Islamic Perspective [Internet].
Al-Bar MA, Chamsi-Pasha H.
Cham (CH): Springer; 2015.
Best Practices in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives: Competing in the 21st Century.
National Research Council (US) Committee on Competing in the 21st Century: Best Practice in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives; Wessner CW, editor.
Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2013.
Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet].
York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.
An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Defense.
National Research Council (US) Committee for Capitalizing on Science, Technology, and Innovation: An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program, Policy and Global Affairs; Wessner CW, editor.
StatPearls [Internet].
Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.
Building the Arkansas Innovation Economy: Summary of a Symposium.
National Research Council (US) Committee on Competing in the 21st Century: Best Practice in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives.
Methods for Evaluating Natural Experiments in Obesity: Systematic Evidence Review [Internet].
Bennett WL, Cheskin LJ, Wilson RF, et al.
Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017 Dec. (Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 204.)
Madame Curie Bioscience Database [Internet].
Austin (TX): Landes Bioscience; 2000-2013.
Minimally Invasive (MI) Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Step-by-Step Approach [Internet].
Swennen GRJ, editor.
Cham (CH): Springer; 2023.
Evidence Based Practice: A Decision-Making Guide for Health Information Professionals [Internet].
Eldredge J.
Albuquerque (NM): University of New Mexico Health Sciences Library and Informatics Center; 2024.
Goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation for early-stage Alzheimer’s and related dementias: the GREAT RCT.
Clare L, Kudlicka A, Oyebode JR, et al.
Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2019 Mar. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 23.10.)
Interventions for adult Eustachian tube dysfunction: a systematic review.
Llewellyn A, Norman G, Harden M, et al.
Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2014 Jul. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 18.46.)
Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Alfirevic Z, Keeney E, Dowswell T, et al.
Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Aug. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 20.65.)
An Assessment of the SBIR Program.
Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2008.
Development and evaluation of tools and an intervention to improve patient- and carer-centred outcomes in Longer-Term Stroke care and exploration of adjustment post stroke: the LoTS care research programme.
Forster A, Mellish K, Farrin A, et al.
Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2014 Dec. (Programme Grants for Applied Research, No. 2.6.)
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
Turn recording back on