Table 4QOL/Intensive vs Standard e-AT Interventions at Different Follow-ups (Fixed-effects Model)

LabelAdjusted mean changeLower 95% CIUpper 95% CIP value
Intensive 3 months (m) vs baseline 7.64552.670312.6206<.001
Intensive 6 mo vs baseline 5.77791.96649.5893<.001
Intensive 12 mo vs baseline 9.29565.762412.8289<.001
Standard 3 mo vs baseline 8.54916.645510.4527<.001
Standard 6 mo vs baseline 8.36556.686610.0444<.001
Standard 12 mo vs baseline 9.39117.893210.8890<.001
Intensive vs standard and 3 mo vs baseline −0.9037−6.23064.4233.7395
Intensive vs standard and 6 mo vs baseline −2.5876−6.75251.5772.2233
Intensive vs standard and 12 mo vs baseline −0.9037−3.93313.7422.9611

Abbreviations: e-AT, eAsthma Tracker; QOL, quality of life.

From: Does an Advanced Electronic Tracker Help Families Manage Children's Asthma Symptoms Better Than a Standard Electronic Tracker?

Cover of Does an Advanced Electronic Tracker Help Families Manage Children's Asthma Symptoms Better Than a Standard Electronic Tracker?
Does an Advanced Electronic Tracker Help Families Manage Children's Asthma Symptoms Better Than a Standard Electronic Tracker? [Internet]
Nkoy FL, Fassl BA, Wilkins VL, et al.
Copyright © 2019. University of Utah. All Rights Reserved.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License which permits noncommercial use and distribution provided the original author(s) and source are credited. (See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.