U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

SRX8632797: GSM4645291: lpla_mup_rep1; Lactobacillus plantarum; OTHER
1 ILLUMINA (NextSeq 500) run: 3M spots, 440.4M bases, 171.9Mb downloads

Submitted by: NCBI (GEO)
Study: RNA degradation analysis reveals ribosome dynamics in complex microbiome samples
show Abstracthide Abstract
The microbiome has revealed itself as a key player in health and disease. To better understand its role, in addition to microbial diversity, it is important to understand species-specific activity and gene expression. While metatranscriptomics investigates mRNA abundance2, it does not inform about faster post-transcriptional regulation3. Although prokaryotic translation is a common target for antibiotics, a direct measurement of microbiome ribosome dynamics remains inaccessible. Here we demonstrate that, contrary to expectation, co-translational mRNA degradation is common in prokaryotes, and that in vivo ribosome protection generates widespread 3-nt periodicity in 5´P mRNA decay intermediates. Consequently, 5´P sequencing allows the study of codon and gene specific ribosome stalling in response to stress and drug treatment at single nucleotide resolution. We validate its wide applicability by investigating in vivo species-specific ribosome footprints of clinical and environmental microbiomes and show that amino acid-specific ribosome protection patterns can be used to phenotype microbiome perturbations. Furthermore, we show that multiple RNase activities collaborate to generate in vivo ribosome footprints and that co-translational degradation is phylogenetically conserved across prokaryotes. This strategy opens the way for the study of the metatranslatome, and allows to investigate fast species-specific post-transcriptional responses to environmental and chemical perturbations in unculturable microbial communities. Overall design: We performed 2 to 5 biologically independent experiment (_rX) for individually grown bacteria, mock community or compost microbiomes using either 5PSeq (PMID: 26046441) or HT-5PSeq (doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.22.165134). Majority of analyzed samples are from total RNA, with the exception of Bacillus subtilis RNA that was extracted from monosome/polyribosome fractions. Samples analyzed in this study include: Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (bamy), Escherichia coli (ecol), Lactobacillus plantarum (lpla), Lactobacillus reuteri (lreu), Bacillus subtilis (bsub-str168 or bsub), Caulobacter vibrioides (cvib), Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (spcc-6803), Alistipes finegoldii (afin), Prevotella copri (pcop), Parabacter merdae (pmer), Prevotella timonesis (ptim), Bacillus subtilis 168 trpC2 rnjA::spc (bsub_del-rnjA), ZymoBIOMICS Microbial Community Standard, cat-no D6300 (zymo), Compost microbiome (comp) and Fecal-cultures (fc). Samples were untreated (ctr), randomly fragmented and re-phosphorylated (frag), and treated with Chloramphenicol (cam), Mupirocin (mup), Erythromycin (ery), Doxycycline (dox), heat shock (hs), NaCL salt stress (saltstress), grown to stationary phase (stat) or exposed to low nutrients (starv). We use 2 different rRNA depletion strategies, either commercial RiBo-zero depletion and PAN-Prokaryote Ribopool (sitoolsbiotech REF dp-K024-000003) using biotinylated probes, or a DSN based rRNA depletion as described in the HT-5PSeq approach. See manuscript for use of specific oligonucleotides and sample specific information regarding treatment condition. Please note that the *mixed sample records were created to include the original mixed fastq files in the records, since the unique molecular identifier information might be lost from the headers of the adapter-trimmed split fastq files (generated for each individual sample).
Sample: lpla_mup_r1_s_r_v1
SAMN15399313 • SRS6919590 • All experiments • All runs
Library:
Instrument: NextSeq 500
Strategy: OTHER
Source: TRANSCRIPTOMIC
Selection: other
Layout: SINGLE
Construction protocol: Microbial cell pellets were resuspended in equal volume of LET (25 mM Tris pH 8.0, 100 mM LiCl, 20 mM EDTA) and water saturated Phenol pH 6.6 (Thermo Fisher), lysed with acid washed glass beads (Sigma-Aldrich) and vortexing for three minutes in MultiMixer. Lysates were supplemented with equal volumes of phenol/chloroform isoamyl alcohol pH 4.5 (25:24:1) and nuclease free water, l two-minute vortexing followed by centrifugation. Resulting aqueous phase was purified in two steps using phenol-chloroform isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) followed by chloroform. After centrifugation, the clean aqueous phase was precipitated with sodium acetate-ethanol. Standard and random fragmented 5PSeq libraries were generated as described in PMID: 26046441 with minor modifications using 150-9000ng total RNA as an input. To prepare random fragmented samples (negative controls), ribosomal RNA was depleted from DNA-free RNA and subsequent fragmented by incubating five minutes at 80 ̊C in fragmentation buffer (40mM Tris Acetate pH 8.1, 100mM KOAc and 30mM MgOAc). Reaction was purified using 2 volumes of RNACleanXP beads (Beckman Coulter) as recommended by the manufacturer. Free 5'OH sites were re-phosphorylated using 5 Units of T4 Polynucleotide kinase (PNK, NEB) and incubated at 37 ̊C for 60 minutes as recommended by the manufacturer. Re-phosphorylated fragmented RNA was purified using Phenol:Chloroform: Isoamyl Alcohol (24:25:1), followed by sodium acetate-ethanol precipitation. From this step forward, procedures for random fragmented and standard 5PSeq library preparation merge. RNA was Ligated to either rP5_RND or rP5_RNA oligo (specified in characteristics protocol). containing unique molecular identifiers). Ribosomal RNA was depleted using Ribozero rRNA removal kit (Illumina) suitable for Bacteria and Yeast. rRNA depleted sample was purified using 1.8V of Ampure beads (Abcam), fragmented using heat (80˚C) for 5 min in 5x Fragmentation Buffer (200mM Tris Acetate pH 8.1,500mM KOAc,150mM MgOAc) and reverse transcribed using random hexamers to prime. Resulting cDNA was bound to streptavidin beads (M-280), subjected to enzymatic reactions of DNA end repair, fill-in of adenine to 5' protruding ends of DNA fragments using Klenow Fragment (NEB). Common adaptor (P7-MPX) was ligated and 5PSeq Libraries were amplified by PCR (15- 17 cycles). Purified samples were quantified using Qubit (Thermo Fisher), library size was estimated from bioanalyzer traces. 5PSeq Libraries were pooled by mixing equal amounts of each sample, following enrichment of fragments of the length between 300-500nt. HT-5PSeq Libraries were generated as recently described (bioRxiv 2020.06.22.165134; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.22.165134). In brief, DNA-free RNA was ligated with RNA oligos containing unique molecular identifiers. Ligated RNA was reverse transcribed priming with oligos containing a random hexamer and an Illumina compatible region. RNA was eliminated by addition of NaOH. Ribosomal RNA was depleted by adding in-house rRNA DNA oligo depletion mixes (table 2) to the cDNA and performing a duplex-specific nuclease (DSN, Evrogen) treatment. rRNA depleted cDNA was PCR amplified (15-17 cycles). Depletion of ribosomal RNA with Ribozero Illumina (for bacteria and yeast) was done after the single-stranded RNA ligation step. Ribosomal depleted RNA was purified and reverse transcribed using the same oligos as stated above, and then amplified by PCR. Libraries were quantified by fluorescence (Qubit, Thermo Fisher), size estimated using an Agilent Bioanalyzer and sequence using a NextSeq500 Illumina sequencer. 5PSeq that captures transcripts with free 5' phospahte (without cap)
Experiment attributes:
GEO Accession: GSM4645291
Links:
Runs: 1 run, 3M spots, 440.4M bases, 171.9Mb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR121087472,990,062440.4M171.9Mb2023-03-24

ID:
11220789

Supplemental Content

Search details

See more...

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...