U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

SRX5771127: GSM3741507: NEO1–Hoxb5+ LT-HSCs [Sample2]; Mus musculus; RNA-Seq
1 ILLUMINA (NextSeq 500) run: 36M spots, 10.9G bases, 3.9Gb downloads

Submitted by: NCBI (GEO)
Study: Neogenin-1 distinguishes between myeloid-biased and balanced Hoxb5+ mouse long-term hematopoietic stem cells
show Abstracthide Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) self-renew and generate all blood cells. Recent studies with single-cell transplants and lineage tracing suggest that adult HSCs are diverse in their reconstitution and lineage potentials. However, prospective isolation of these subpopulations has remained challenging. Here, we identify Neogenin-1 (NEO1) as a unique surface marker on a fraction of mouse HSCs labeled with Hoxb5, a specific reporter of long-term HSCs (LT-HSCs). We show that NEO1+Hoxb5+ LT-HSCs expand with age and respond to myeloablative stress in young mice, while NEO1–Hoxb5+ LT-HSCs exhibit no significant change in number. Furthermore, NEO1+Hoxb5+ LT-HSCs are more often in the G2/S cell cycle phase compared to NEO1–Hoxb5+ LT-HSCs in both young and old bone marrow. Upon serial transplantation, NEO1+Hoxb5+ LT-HSCs exhibit myeloid-biased differentiation and reduced reconstitution, while NEO1–Hoxb5+ LT-HSCs are lineage-balanced and stably reconstitute recipients. Gene expression analysis reveals erythroid and myeloid priming in the NEO1+ fraction and association of quiescence and self-renewal-related transcription factors with NEO1- LT-HSCs. Finally, transplanted NEO1+Hoxb5+ LT-HSCs rarely generate NEO1–Hoxb5+ LT-HSCs, while NEO1–Hoxb5+ LT-HSCs repopulate both LT-HSC fractions. This supports a model in which dormant, balanced, NEO1–Hoxb5+ LT-HSCs can hierarchically precede active, myeloid-biased NEO1+Hoxb5+ LT-HSCs. Overall design: Bulk RNA-sequencing profiles of NEO1+Hoxb5+ (n = 5) and NEO1–Hoxb5+ (n = 5) LT-HSCs from the bone marrow of 2- to 3-month-old Hoxb5­-mCherry mice.
Sample: NEO1–Hoxb5+ LT-HSCs [Sample2]
SAMN11538967 • SRS4705013 • All experiments • All runs
Organism: Mus musculus
Library:
Instrument: NextSeq 500
Strategy: RNA-Seq
Source: TRANSCRIPTOMIC
Selection: cDNA
Layout: PAIRED
Construction protocol: 250-500 cells from two pooled mice per sample were sorted directly into 100 μL of lysis buffer (Buffer RL) and RNA was isolated with the Single Cell RNA Purification Kit (Norgen Biotek Corp.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA quality was measured by capillary electrophoresis using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer with Nano mRNA assay at the Stanford Protein and Nucleic Acid (PAN) Facility Libraries were prepared using the Smart-seq2 protocol by Picelli et al., 2014 with minor modifications. Briefly, cDNA was generated by oligo-dT primed reverse transcription with MMLV reverse transcriptase (SMARTScribe, Clontech) and a locked template-switching oligonucleotide (TSO). This was followed by 18 cycles of PCR amplification using KAPA HiFi hotStart ReadyMix and ISPCR primers. Amplified cDNA was then purified using 0.7x volume Agencourt AMPure XP beads to remove smaller fragments. The resulting cDNA concentration and size distribution for each well was determined on a capillary electrophoresis-based Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer with High Sensitivity DNA chip at the Stanford PAN facility. 40 ng of cDNA was then tagmented, uniquely barcoded, and PCR enriched using the Nextera DNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Libraries were then pooled in equimolar amounts and purified of smaller fragments using 0.7x Agencourt AMPure XP beads. Pooled libraries were checked for quality using the Agilent Bioanalyzer with High Sensitivity DNA chip at the Stanford PAN facility.
Links:
Runs: 1 run, 36M spots, 10.9G bases, 3.9Gb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR899207136,032,87410.9G3.9Gb2019-11-12

ID:
7760974

Supplemental Content

Search details

See more...

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...