U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

SRX5131403: GSM3514877: P1_3MI_rep1_input; Mus musculus; ChIP-Seq
1 ILLUMINA (NextSeq 500) run: 27.1M spots, 2G bases, 1.2Gb downloads

Submitted by: NCBI (GEO)
Study: Epigenome profiling of neonatal heart regeneration
show Abstracthide Abstract
Background: The adult mammalian heart has limited capacity for regeneration following injury, whereas the neonatal heart can readily regenerate within a short period after birth. To uncover the molecular mechanisms underlying neonatal heart regeneration, we compared the transcriptomes and epigenomes of regenerative and non-regenerative mouse hearts over a 7-day time period following myocardial infarction. Methods: RNA-Seq, H3K27ac ChIP-Seq and H3K27me3 ChIP-Seq were performed on ventricular samples from regenerative P1 or non-regenerative P8 mouse hearts at +1.5d, +3d and +7d after MI or Sham surgery to assemble the transcriptome, active chromatin and repressed chromatin landscapes during neonatal heart regeneration. Dynamic enhancer landscapes from mouse hearts during cardiac development were analyzed using data from ENCODE. Effects on cardiomyocyte proliferation and cardiac function from selected factors identified in this study were tested using BrdU/EdU pulse-labeling or mouse models coupled with immunohistochemistry and echocardiography. Results: By integrating gene expression profiles with histone marks associated with active or repressed chromatin, we identified transcriptional programs underlying neonatal heart regeneration and the blockade to regeneration in later life. Our results reveal a unique immune response in regenerative hearts and an embryonic cardiogenic gene program that remains active during neonatal heart regeneration. Among the unique immune factors and embryonic genes associated with cardiac regeneration, we identified Ccl24, which encodes a cytokine, and Igf2bp3, which encodes an RNA-binding protein, as previously unrecognized regulators of cardiomyocyte proliferation. Conclusions: Our data provide insights into the molecular basis of neonatal heart regeneration and identify genes that might be modulated to promote heart regeneration. Overall design: We performed myocardial infarction (MI) or sham surgeries to mouse hearts at postnatal day 1 or day 8. At 1.5d, 3d or 7d post P1 and P8 surgery, ventricle samples below the surgery plane were collected in duplicate for H3K27ac and H3K27me3 ChIP-Seq
Sample: P1_3MI_rep1_input
SAMN10594315 • SRS4144313 • All experiments • All runs
Organism: Mus musculus
Library:
Instrument: NextSeq 500
Strategy: ChIP-Seq
Source: GENOMIC
Selection: ChIP
Layout: SINGLE
Construction protocol: Each heart was dissected in ice-cold PBS and a transverse cut on ligation plane was made, separating it into above ligation plane (ALP) part and below ligation plane (BLP) part. BLP parts were flash-frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored in -80°C for RNA-Seq. The collected tissue samples were ground to powder in liquid nitrogen, and crosslinked with 2% formaldehyde in PBS for 30 min and quenched with 0.125M glycine for 10 min at room temperature. Crosslinked samples were then washed with cold PBS and further homogenized with a Dounce tissue grinder. Samples were collected by a brief spin, and treated with 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10mM NaCl and 0.2% NP-40 for 30 min to collect nuclei. After nuclear extraction, chromatin was sheared on a Bioruptor Pico (Diagenode) for 20 cycles (30 sec on/ 30 sec off for each cycle) at 4°C in sonication buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.25% sarkosyl, 1 mM DTT, 1x cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche), and 1 mM PMSF, pH 8.0). After sonication, 1% of the sonicated chromatin from each sample was taken out as “input” samples. The remaining sonicated chromatin was evenly split for H3K27ac or H3K27me3 ChIP. Sonication buffer was added to make the final volume to 1 mL. NaCl was then added to a final concentration of 300 mM for each sample. 1 µg H3K27ac antibody (Diagenode, C15410196) or H3K27me3 (Diagenode, C15410195) was added to each sample and incubated at 4°C overnight with gentle rotation. The next day, 30 µL of pre-washed Dynabeads Protein G (Invitrogen, 10004D) was added to each sample for a two-hour incubation. After that, the beads were washed twice with 1 mL RIPA 0 buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, pH 8.0), twice with 1 mL RIPA 0.3 buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, 300 mM NaCl, pH 8.0), twice with 1 mL LiCl wash buffer (250 mM LiCl, 0.5% IGEPAL CA-630, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0), and finally twice with 1 mL TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). For each ChIP sample or input sample, 100 uL of SDS elution buffer (1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) was added and incubation was done at 65°C overnight on a ThermoMixer (Eppendorf) at 1000 rpm. The next day, supernatant was collected and further treated with 0.5 µg RNaseA (Sigma, 11119915001) for 30 min at 37°C, followed by 20 µg Proteinase K (NEB, P8107S) treatment at 37°C for 2h. DNA was recovered using MinElute PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN, 28004) according to manufacturer's protocol. ChIP-Seq libraries were generated using NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB, E7645L) according to manufacturer's protocol.
Experiment attributes:
GEO Accession: GSM3514877
Links:
Runs: 1 run, 27.1M spots, 2G bases, 1.2Gb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR831880727,128,9462G1.2Gb2019-07-15

ID:
6945390

Supplemental Content

Search details

See more...

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...