U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

SRX2614232: GSM2522791: AG-AGe2-R1; synthetic construct; SELEX
1 ILLUMINA (Illumina HiSeq 2000) run: 3.2M spots, 64M bases, 42.4Mb downloads

Submitted by: NCBI (GEO)
Study: Differences in DNA-binding specificity of floral homeotic protein complexes predict organ-specific target genes
show Abstracthide Abstract
Floral organ identities in plants are specified by the combinatorial action of homeotic master regulatory transcription factors (TFs). How these factors achieve their regulatory specificities is however still largely unclear. Genome-wide in vivo DNA binding data show that homeotic MADS-domain proteins recognize partly distinct genomic regions, suggesting that DNA binding specificity contributes to functional differences of homeotic protein complexes. We used in vitro systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment followed by high throughput DNA sequencing (SELEX-seq) on several floral MADS-domain protein homo- and heterodimers to measure their DNA-binding specificities. We show that specification of reproductive organs is associated with distinct binding preferences of a complex formed by SEPALLATA3 (SEP3) and AGAMOUS (AG). Binding specificity is further modulated by different binding site (BS) spacing preferences. Combination of SELEX-seq and genome-wide DNA binding data allows to differentiate between targets in specification of reproductive versus perianth organs in the flower. We validate the importance of DNA-binding specificity for organ-specific gene regulation by modulating promoter activity through targeted mutagenesis. Our study shows that intrafamily protein interactions affect DNA-binding specificity of floral MADS-domain proteins. DNA-binding specificity of individual dimers, as well as DNA-binding preferences of higher-order complexes differ between floral homeotic protein complexes. Differential DNA-binding of MADS-domain protein complexes plays a role in the specificity of target gene regulation. Overall design: SELEX-seq for MADS-domain protein homo- and heterocomplexes using random pool of DNA and in vitro synthetized proteins.
Sample: AG-AGe2-R1
SAMN06481580 • SRS2024669 • All experiments • All runs
Library:
Instrument: Illumina HiSeq 2000
Strategy: SELEX
Source: GENOMIC
Selection: other
Layout: SINGLE
Construction protocol: The dsDNA libraries were made from the ssDNA sequences by single-cycle PCR amplification with a complementary primer essentially as described before (Jolma et al., 2010). The dsDNA libraries contained 20 random nucleotide fragment flanked by specific barcodes that allowed for later characterization when multiplexed in high-throughput sequencing. Protein dimers were synthesized using TNT SP6 Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation System (Promega) following the manufacturer’s instructions in a total volume of 20 µl and equimolar expression plasmid concentrations. The binding reaction mix was prepared essentially as described previously for EMSA experiments (Egea-Cortines et al., 1999; Smaczniak et al., 2012b) and contained 20 µl of in vitro-synthesized proteins and 50-100 ng of dsDNA library in a total volume of 120 µl. The binding reaction was incubated on ice for 1 h followed by 1 h immunoprecipitation with protein specific antibodies (affinity-purified peptide antibodies, Eurogentec) coupled to magnetic beads (MyOne, Invitrogen) in a thermomixer at 4 °C with constant mixing at 700 rpm. Magnetic beads with attached antibodies where prepared in advance according to manufacturer’s instructions (MyOne, Invitrogen) with purified antibodies resuspended in 1X PBS (~1 mg/ml); 20 µg of antibodies and 0.5 mg of beads were used for a single binding reaction. After immunopreciptiation, beads were washed 5 times with 150 µl of binding buffer without salmon-sperm DNA and bound DNA was eluted with 50 µl 1X TE in a thermomixer at 90 °C with full mixing speed. Afterwards, magnetic beads were immobilized and the supernatant was transferred to a 1.5-ml tube. DNA fragments were amplified with 10 to 15 cycles of PCR with SELEX round-specific primers (Jolma et al., 2010) and the total amplicon was used in the subsequent SELEX round. The amplification efficiency was checked on the agarose gel by comparing to a known concentration of a standard probe. Samples for sequencing, after amplification, were cut out from agarose gel and purified using MinElute Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen). Each SELEX library was quantified by Qubit and processed by BioAnalyser. The same rounds of SELEX were multiplexed by mixing in equimolar amounts and diluted to 10 nM. Such multiplexed libraries were processed following Illumina's "Denature and Dilute Libraries Guide" with 40% PhiX control. Samples were sequences on GAII or HiSeq2000.
Experiment attributes:
GEO Accession: GSM2522791
Links:
Runs: 1 run, 3.2M spots, 64M bases, 42.4Mb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR53145803,197,75264M42.4Mb2017-10-16

ID:
3785807

Supplemental Content

Search details

See more...

Recent activity