U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from BioSample

SRX17467593: GSM6556058: Gallus gallus utricle, cell-166; Gallus gallus; RNA-Seq
1 ILLUMINA (NextSeq 500) run: 979,642 spots, 292.5M bases, 131.7Mb downloads

External Id: GSM6556058_r1
Submitted by: Genome Analysis Unit, Amgen Inc
Study: Cell-type identity of the avian utricle
show Abstracthide Abstract
The avian utricle, a vestibular organ of the inner ear, displays turnover of sensory hair cells throughout life. This is in sharp contrast to the mammalian utricle, which shows limited regenerative capacity. Here, we use single-cell RNA-sequencing to identify distinct marker genes for the different sensory hair cell subtypes of the chicken utricle, which we validated in situ . We provide markers for spatially distinct supporting cell populations, and identified two transitional cell populations of dedifferentiating supporting cells and developing hair cells. Trajectory reconstruction resulted in an inventory of gene expression dynamics of natural hair cell generation in the avian utricle. Overall design: Utricles were dissected, single cells were deposited into individual wells of 96-well plates using flow cytometry and processed for single-cell RNA-sequencing
Sample: Gallus gallus utricle, cell-166
SAMN30712658 • SRS15021041 • All experiments • All runs
Organism: Gallus gallus
Library:
Name: GSM6556058
Instrument: NextSeq 500
Strategy: RNA-Seq
Source: TRANSCRIPTOMIC SINGLE CELL
Selection: cDNA
Layout: PAIRED
Construction protocol: Utricles were dissected in ice-cold Medium 199, otolithic membranes were mechanically removed, and tissue was incubated in thermolysin (0.5 mg/mL M199 medium) for 20 minutes at 37°C. Thermolysin activity was attenuated with 10% FBS in M199. The sensory epithelia were carefully peeled off from the underlying stromal cells using a 30- gauge 1⁄2-inch hypodermic needle attached to a 1 mL syringe. For each experiment, we pooled 4-8 sensory epithelia. The epithelia were dissociated using 1X Accutase for 20 minutes at 37°C, followed by mild mechanical trituration, and washed twice with PBS using a centrifugation step (300 x g, 5 min, room temperature (RT)). Viable single cells were isolated with a Becton Dickinson FACSAria Fusion flow cytometer (Ellwanger et al., 2018). Two independent batches of 270 cells were deposited into individual wells of 96-well plates, prefilled with 4 μl of a premade lysis solution with 1 U/μl of recombinant RNase inhibitor, 0.1% Triton X-100, 2.5 mM dNTP mix, 2.5 μM oligo d(T)30 VN (5'-AAGCAGTGGTATCAACGCAGAGTACT30VN-3', IDT). Plates containing sorted cells were immediately sealed, frozen on dry ice, and stored at −80°C. Single-cell RNA-seq was performed via Picelli and colleagues' method (Picelli et al., 2014) using SMARTscribe for reverse transcription followed by 22 amplification cycles. Amplified cDNAs were purified by AMPure Beads cleanup using a Biomek FX automated platform and assessed with a fragment analyzer (Agilent) for quantitation and quality assurance. Barcoded libraries were synthesized using a scaled-down Nextera XT protocol (Mora-Castilla et al., 2016) in a total volume of 4 μl. A total of 384 libraries were pooled, and paired-end sequenced (2 x 150 bp) on a NextSeq 500/550 High Output flow cell.
Runs: 1 run, 979,642 spots, 292.5M bases, 131.7Mb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR21463906979,642292.5M131.7Mb2022-09-08

ID:
24299846

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...