U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from BioSample

SRX11417127: ddRAD_rockhopper_penguins
1 ILLUMINA (Illumina HiSeq 4000) run: 2.3M spots, 211.9M bases, 74.9Mb downloads

Design: We prepared double digest Restriction-site Associated DNA (ddRAD) libraries, following the protocol described in Peterson, Weber, Kay, Fisher, and Hoekstra (2012). Genomic DNA was digested using 0.5 L of EcoRI (0.1 U/ L) and 0.5 L of SphI-HF (0.1 U/ L), at 37C for 3 hours. Each sample was then ligated to a barcode (P1). We formed pools of 24 individuals and used a second index (an Illumina adapter) for the identification of each group; thus individuals were distinguished using two different identifiers. We then used a Pippin Prep (Sage Science) to select fragments of 300-400 bp and assessed size selection, integrity, and quantification of the samples using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer system. Illumina adaptors (P2) were ligated for each sample, and each pool was amplified using 8-10 PCR cycles with an Applied Biosystems 2720 Thermal Cycler, using the following protocol: initial denaturation was at 98C for 30 seconds, then 8-10 cycles of 98C for 30 seconds, 60C for 30 seconds, and 72C for one minute, ending with a final elongation step of 72C for five minutes. We purified samples using the Thermo Scientific MagJET Separation Rack and performed a final quantification using the fluorometer Qubit (Life technologies).
Submitted by: Universidad de Chile
Study: ddRAD rockhopper penguins
show Abstracthide Abstract
Delimiting recently divergent species is challenging. During speciation, genetic differentiation may not be evenly distributed across the genome, as different genomic regions can be subject to different evolutionary histories. When using a limited number of genetic markers, species delimitation can become particularly challenging and may lead to taxonomic inconsistencies and conflicting results between studies. Rockhopper penguins of the genus Eudyptes comprise three broadly recognized taxa: northern rockhopper (E. moseleyi), southern rockhopper (E. chrysocome) and eastern rockhopper (E. filholi), although their taxonomic status has proven controversial for decades. Some authors have suggested that E. chrysocome and E. filholi should be considered separate species, whereas others suggested they should be considered conspecific. These studies, however, have based their conclusions on a limited number of genetic markers. Here we used thousands of genomic markers to evaluate genetic differentiation and species delimitation in E. moseleyi, E. filholi and E. chrysocome. We also assessed contemporary migration rates and admixture between colonies. Across all analyses we found a pattern of genetic differentiation exhibiting a continuum between E. moseleyi, the earliest-diverging taxon, to the more recently diverged E. chrysocome and E. filholi, and then to the relatively subtle differentiation among populations of each taxon. The extent of genetic differentiation between the three taxa was consistently higher than population-level genetic differentiation found within these (and other) penguin species. We found no evidence of admixture between the three taxa, suggesting they are genetically isolated. Species molecular delimitation analyses, along with other lines of evidence, provide strong taxonomic support for the distinction of three species of rockhopper penguins. These results bear relevance to the management and conservation of this widely distributed taxonomic group.
Sample:
SAMN20174759 • SRS9459892 • All experiments • All runs
Library:
Name: SAMN20174759_rockhoppers
Instrument: Illumina HiSeq 4000
Strategy: OTHER
Source: GENOMIC
Selection: Restriction Digest
Layout: SINGLE
Runs: 1 run, 2.3M spots, 211.9M bases, 74.9Mb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR151082672,328,085211.9M74.9Mb2022-08-01

ID:
15274252

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...