U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

SRX1802186: GSM2178826: ribo_tif3delta replicate 2_15 deg; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; RNA-Seq
1 ILLUMINA (Illumina HiSeq 2500) run: 23.4M spots, 1.2G bases, 692.8Mb downloads

Submitted by: NCBI (GEO)
Study: eIF4B preferentially stimulates translation of long mRNAs with structured 5’UTRs and low closed-loop potential but weak dependence on eIF4G
show Abstracthide Abstract
DEAD-box RNA helicases eIF4A and Ded1 promote translation by resolving mRNA secondary structures that impede preinitiation complex (PIC) attachment to mRNA or scanning. eIF4B is a cofactor for eIF4A but might also function independently of eIF4A. Ribosome profiling of mutants lacking eIF4B or with impaired eIF4A or Ded1 activity revealed that eliminating eIF4B reduces the relative translational efficiencies of many more genes than does inactivation of eIF4A, despite comparable reductions in bulk translation, and few genes display unusually strong requirements for both factors. However, either eliminating eIF4B or inactivating eIF4A preferentially impacts mRNAs with longer, more structured 5’UTRs. These findings reveal an eIF4A-independent role for eIF4B in addition to its function as eIF4A cofactor in promoting PIC attachment or scanning on structured mRNAs. eIF4B, eIF4A, and Ded1 mutations also preferentially impair translation of longer mRNAs in a fashion mitigated by the ability to form closed-loop mRNPs via eIF4F-Pab1 association, suggesting cooperation between closed-loop assembly and eIF4B/helicase functions. Remarkably, depleting eIF4G, the scaffold subunit of eIF4F, preferentially impacts short mRNAs with strong closed-loop potential and unstructured 5’UTRs, exactly the opposite features associated with hyperdependence on the eIF4B/helicases. We propose that short, highly efficient mRNAs preferentially depend on the stimulatory effects of eIF4G-dependent closed-loop assembly. Overall design: We compared the effects of mutations in eIF4B on global translational efficiencies (TEs) in yeast by ribosome footprint profiling. The study includes 16 samples, comprised of 8 mRNA-Seq samples and 8 ribosome footprint profiling samples, derived from biological replicates of tif3? mutant strain, and the corresponding TIF3 wild-type strain . These strains were analyzed following a temperature shift at 37°C or 15°C.
Sample: ribo_tif3delta replicate 2_15 deg
SAMN05180518 • SRS1468738 • All experiments • All runs
Library:
Instrument: Illumina HiSeq 2500
Strategy: RNA-Seq
Source: TRANSCRIPTOMIC
Selection: cDNA
Layout: SINGLE
Construction protocol: Cells were rapidly vacuum filtered and flash frozen. Whole cell extracts were prepared by breaking cells in freezer mill. Ribosome profiling (Rnase I footprinting, size selection,RNA extraction, preadenylated linker ligation, reverse transcription, cDNA circularization, PCR amplification) was done as described Ingolia NT, Ghaemmaghami S, Newman JR, Weissman JS. 2009. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324(5924):218-223
Experiment attributes:
GEO Accession: GSM2178826
Links:
Runs: 1 run, 23.4M spots, 1.2G bases, 692.8Mb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR359181523,385,1981.2G692.8Mb2016-05-29

ID:
2577747

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...