U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

SRX8833540: GSM4697862: RPF_4sU40_exp2; Mus musculus; RNA-Seq
3 ILLUMINA (NextSeq 500) runs: 170.3M spots, 8.7G bases, 2.9Gb downloads

Submitted by: NCBI (GEO)
Study: nRibo-Seq timecourse in RAW264.7 cells
show Abstracthide Abstract
mRNAs are generally assumed to be loaded instantly with ribosomes upon entry into the cytoplasm. To measure ribosome density on nascent mRNA, we developed nascent Ribo-Seq (nRibo-Seq) by combining Ribo-Seq with progressive 4-thiouridine labelling. In mouse macrophages, we experimentally determined, for the first time, the lag between the appearance of nascent RNA and its association with ribosomes, which was calculated to be 20 - 22 min for bulk mRNA, and approximated the time it takes for mRNAs to be fully loaded with ribosomes to be 41 - 44 min. Notably, ribosomal loading time is adapted to gene function as rapid loading was observed with highly regulated genes. The lag and ribosomal loading time correlate positively with ORF size and half-life, and negatively with tRNA adaptation indices. Similar results were obtained in mESCs, where the lag between IN and FP was even more pronounced with 35 - 38 min. We validated our measurements after stimulation of macrophages with lipopolysaccharide, where the lag between cytoplasmic and translated mRNA leads to a corresponding uncoupling between input and ribosome-protected fragments. Uncoupling is stronger for mRNAs with long ORFs or half-lives, a finding we also confirmed at the level of protein production by nascent chain proteomics. As a consequence of the lag in ribosome loading, ribosome density measurements are distorted when performed under conditions where mRNA levels are far from steady state expression, and transcriptional changes affect ribosome density in a passive way. This study uncovers an unexpected and considerable lag in ribosome loading, and provides guidelines for the interpretation of Ribo-Seq data taking passive effects on ribosome density into account. Overall design: Limited RNaseI digest or alkaline fragmentation of cytoplasmic input mRNA after metabolic labelling with 4-thiouridine (4sU) to asses ribosome density on nascent mRNAs in RAW264.7 cells
Sample: RPF_4sU40_exp2
SAMN15654990 • SRS7097643 • All experiments • All runs
Organism: Mus musculus
Library:
Instrument: NextSeq 500
Strategy: RNA-Seq
Source: TRANSCRIPTOMIC
Selection: cDNA
Layout: SINGLE
Construction protocol: Cells were washed once in ice-cold 1 x PBS supplemented with 100 µg/ml cycloheximide (Roth, 8682.3), and harvested by scraping in polysome lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 200 mM KCl2, 1% NP-40, 100 µg/ml cycloheximide, 2 mM DTT, 1 tablet EDTA-free Roche cOmplete Mini Protease Inhibitor per 10 ml). Lysates were rotated end-over-end for 10 min at 4°C and cleared by centrifugation at 9,300 g for 10 min at 4°C. About 10% of the lysates were saved as input samples. The lysates were subsequently digested with RNase I (240 U per A260; Ambion AM2294) for 5 min at 4°C. Samples were then subjected to 17.5–50% sucrose density gradient centrifugation (for 1 h 45 min at 40,000 rpm and 4°C in a SW60 rotor) and fractions of 250 – 300 µl were collected with a Teledyne Isco Foxy Jr. fractionator directly into 300 µl urea buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl ph 7.5, 350 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 1% SDS, 7 M urea). RNA was purified from the cytoplasmic lysate (input) or from the monosomal fractions (ribosome footprint) using phenol:chloroform:isoamylalcohol (25:24:1, AppliChem A0944) by phase separation and precipitation with GlycoBlue (Ambion AM9515) in 50 – 60% isopropanol. Both input and ribosome protected fragments were depleted of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) with the Ribo-Zero Gold Kit (Illumina MRZG126). Input RNA was randomly fragmented by alkaline hydrolysis at pH 10.0 for 12 min at 95°C. Per sample, 0.5 ng spike-in RNA (5'-ATCTACGCGCGA-4sU-AAGGCTAAGCTAGGCACC-3') was added. Conversion of 4sU to cytidine was induced by treatment with 10 mM NaIO4 in 600 mM NH4Cl pH 8.5 for 15 min at 40°C in a thermomixer. After the conversion reaction, RNA was recovered with G-25 mini Quick Spin Oligo Columns (Roche). Fragmented RNA and ribosome protected fragments were size-selected (25 – 35 nt) on a 15% polyacrylamide Tris-borate-EDTA-urea gel after staining with SybrGold. RNA was eluted from the gel slices by rotating at 4°C overnight in 300 mM NaCl plus RNase OUT (Invitrogen). The gel matrix was removed by centrifugation in a 0.45 µM NanoSep MF tube (PALL). After precipitation with isopropanol and GlycoBlue, end-repair was performed with 10 U T4 PNK (NEB M0201S), 40 U RNase OUT and 1 mM ATP in T4 PNK reaction buffer for 1 h at 37°C. After end-repair with T4 PNK, libraries were prepared with the NEXTflex Small RNA-Seq Kit v3 according to the manufacturer's manual, using 5 ng RNA for experiment 1 and 8 ng for experiment 2. In order to determine the number of PCR cycles required to obtain a ~ 20 nM library, 1 µl of cDNA per sample was diluted 1:8 and used for a SybrGreen qPCR (forward primer: 5'-GTTCAGAGTTCTACAGTCCGA-3', reverse primer: 5'-CCTTGGCACCCGAGAATTCCA-3', SybrGreen master mix: applied biosystems A25742) on a QuantStudio Real-Time PCR System. For library preparation, three cycles less than the highest determined cycle of threshold were used (12 cycles for experiment 1 and 11 cycles for experiment 2).
Experiment attributes:
GEO Accession: GSM4697862
Links:
Runs: 3 runs, 170.3M spots, 8.7G bases, 2.9Gb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR1233357443,353,6652.2G755.8Mb2021-06-24
SRR1233357585,744,6504.4G1.4Gb2021-06-24
SRR1233357641,156,0992.1G733.6Mb2021-06-24

ID:
11489906

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...