U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

SRX2468766: UCE target enrichment of Prionopelta_amabilis_EX1651: whole organism
1 ILLUMINA (Illumina HiSeq 2500) run: 2.6M spots, 645.8M bases, 329.5Mb downloads

Design: For all sequenced taxa we extracted DNA using Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kits (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA) and we fragmented up to 50 ng of input DNA to an average fragment distribution of 400-600 bp using a Qsonica Q800R sonicator (60-120 seconds of sonication, 25% amplitude, 10s-10s pulse; Qsonica LLC, Newton, CT). The amount of input DNA was calculated accurately by measuring the DNA concentration of extracts with a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA). Following sonication, we constructed sequencing libraries using Kapa Hyper Prep library preparation kits (Kapa Biosystems Inc., Wilmington, MA) and custom dual-indexing barcodes (Glenn et al. 2016). We followed the manufacturerŐs protocol except that we performed all steps, except PCR, at one-quarter volume. We assessed success of library preparation following 12-15X PCR amplification by measuring DNA concentration and by visualizing libraries on an agarose gel. We purified post-PCR libraries by performing a 0.8 to 1.0X SPRI-bead clean-up using an AMPure XP substitute (Rohland & Reich 2012). For each UCE enrichment reaction, we pooled 10 libraries together at equimolar concentrations and adjusted pool concentrations to 147 ng/_l using a vacuum centrifuge. For each enrichment we used a total of 500 ng of DNA (3.4 _l each pool), and we enriched the DNA with our newly designed ant-specific bait library (includes the exon baits), diluted 1:4 (baits:water). We hybridized RNA bait libraries to sequencing libraries at 65źC for a period of 24 hours, and we enriched each pool following a standardized enrichment protocol (version 1.5; available from http://ultraconserved.org). We verified enrichment success with qPCR (CFX96 Touch, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) by comparing amplification profiles of unenriched to enriched pools using PCR primers designed from several UCE loci (Table S4). After verification, we used qPCR to measure the DNA concentration of each enriched pool, and we combined all pools together at equimolar ratios to produce a final pool-of-pools. We sent the final pool-of-pools to the High-Throughput Genomics Center at the University of Utah, where the samples were quality checked on an Agilent 2200 TapeStation (High Sensitivity D1K tape; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), quantified with qPCR (Kapa Library Quant Kit), and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 (2x125 v4 chemistry; Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA).
Submitted by: University of Utah
Study: Enriching the ant tree of life: enhanced UCE bait set for genome-scale phylogenetics of ants and other Hymenoptera
show Abstracthide Abstract
1. Targeted enrichment of conserved genomic regions (e.g., ultraconserved elements or UCEs) has emerged as a promising tool for inferring evolutionary history in many organismal groups. Because the UCE approach is still relatively new, much remains to be learned about how best to identify UCE loci and design baits to enrich them. 2. We test an updated UCE identification and bait design workflow for the insect order Hymenoptera, with a particular focus on ants. The new strategy augments a previous bait design for Hymenoptera by (a) changing the parameters by which conserved genomic regions are identified and retained, and (b) increasing the number of genomes used for locus identification and bait design. We perform in vitro validation of the approach in ants by synthesizing an ant-specific bait set that targets UCE loci and a set of “legacy” phylogenetic markers. Using this bait set, we generate new data for 84 taxa (16/17 ant subfamilies) and extract loci from an additional 17 genome-enabled taxa. We then use these data to examine UCE capture success and phylogenetic performance across ants. We also test the workability of extracting legacy markers from enriched samples and combining the data with published data sets. 3. The updated bait design (hym-v2) contained a total of 2,590-targeted UCE loci for Hymenoptera, significantly increasing the number of loci relative to the original bait set (hym-v1; 1,510 loci). Across 38 genome-enabled Hymenoptera and 84 enriched samples, experiments demonstrated a high and unbiased capture success rate, with the mean locus enrichment rate being 2,214 loci per sample. Phylogenomic analyses of ants produced a robust tree that included strong support for previously uncertain relationships. Complementing the UCE results, we successfully enriched legacy markers, combined the data with published Sanger data sets, and generated a comprehensive ant phylogeny containing 1,060 terminals. 4. Overall, the new UCE bait design strategy resulted in an enhanced bait set for genome-scale phylogenetics in ants and likely all of Hymenoptera. Our in vitro tests demonstrate the utility of the updated design workflow, providing evidence that this approach could be applied to any organismal group with available genomic information.
Sample: Sample used for DNA extraction. Additional specimen data available at www.antweb.org.
SAMN06208940 • SRS1901073 • All experiments • All runs
Library:
Name: Prionopelta_amabilis_EX1651
Instrument: Illumina HiSeq 2500
Strategy: WGS
Source: GENOMIC
Selection: Hybrid Selection
Layout: PAIRED
Runs: 1 run, 2.6M spots, 645.8M bases, 329.5Mb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR51506762,583,160645.8M329.5Mb2017-03-01

ID:
3582163

Supplemental Content

Search details

See more...

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...