An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients

Am J Bioeth. 2011 May;11(5):39-49. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.562595.

Abstract

Research to improve the health of pregnant and fetal patients presents ethical challenges to clinical investigators, institutional review boards, funding agencies, and data safety and monitoring boards. The Common Rule sets out requirements that such research must satisfy but no ethical framework to guide their application. We provide such an ethical framework, based on the ethical concept of the fetus as a patient. We offer criteria for innovation and for Phase I and II and then for Phase III clinical trials to improve the health of pregnant patients and of fetal patients and also criteria to responsibly manage the transition from investigation to clinical practice. Basing ethical criteria for research involving pregnant women on the ethical concept of the fetus as a patient insulates the proposed ethical framework and therefore research on pregnant women from the divisive and politicized concepts and discourses of personhood, fetal rights, and unborn child.

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Trials as Topic / ethics*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Ethics Committees, Research
  • Ethics, Research
  • Female
  • Fetal Research / ethics*
  • Fetal Research / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Fetal Viability
  • Human Experimentation / ethics*
  • Human Experimentation / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Humans
  • Informed Consent* / ethics
  • Informed Consent* / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Moral Obligations*
  • Patients
  • Personhood*
  • Physician-Patient Relations / ethics*
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnant Women*
  • Principle-Based Ethics*
  • Research Subjects
  • Researcher-Subject Relations / ethics*
  • Translational Research, Biomedical / ethics*
  • United States