Yes We Can: Eating Healthy on a Limited Budget

J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Mar;51(3):268-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.12.002.

Abstract

Objective: This study determined how people who live in low-income households can consume an affordable, nutritious diet.

Design: A community-based participatory research (CBPR) project was completed that developed and priced 2 weeks of healthy menus that met US Department of Agriculture Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Prices were collected from a market basket survey of 13 stores in the city of Chico during October, 2010. Initial menu development began in 2011-2012. Menus were reviewed in 2017 and reflect current guidelines.

Setting: Chico, CA.

Main outcome measures: Macro dietary objectives including the caloric content and servings of fat, sugar, whole grains, and fruits and vegetables. The cost of purchasing the market basket of goods for a family of 4 that achieved those objectives was determined.

Results: The 2 weeks of menus all met dietary objectives on average. The daily cost varied from $19 to $31 when food was purchased from a bulk supermarket, with an average daily cost of $25. Average monthly cost was $756 in 2010 dollars, or $838 in 2015 dollars.

Conclusions and implications: People living in low-income households can afford to eat healthily. Using CBPR principles, daily targets, and technical support, public health partners can partner with community members for member-defined solutions that are affordable and meet dietary guidelines. Access to stores that sell low-price bulk items is important to being able to afford a healthy diet.

Keywords: cost; healthy eating; low-income; market basket study.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Child
  • Community-Based Participatory Research
  • Consumer Behavior / economics
  • Consumer Behavior / statistics & numerical data
  • Diet Surveys
  • Diet, Healthy* / economics
  • Diet, Healthy* / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Nutrition Policy / economics*
  • Poverty