Cross-Situational Learning Is Supported by Propose-but-Verify Hypothesis Testing

Curr Biol. 2018 Apr 2;28(7):1132-1136.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.042. Epub 2018 Mar 15.

Abstract

When we encounter a new word, there are often multiple objects that the word might refer to [1]. Nonetheless, because names for concrete nouns are constant, we are able to learn them across successive encounters [2, 3]. This form of "cross-situational" learning may result from either associative mechanisms that gradually accumulate evidence for each word-object association [4, 5] or rapid propose-but-verify (PbV) mechanisms where only one hypothesized referent is stored for each word, which is either subsequently verified or rejected [6, 7]. Using model-based representation similarity analyses of fMRI data acquired during learning, we find evidence for learning mediated by a PbV mechanism. This learning may be underpinned by rapid pattern-separation processes in the hippocampus. Our findings shed light on the psychological and neural processes that support word learning, suggesting that adults rely on their episodic memory to track a limited number of word-object associations.

Keywords: computational modeling; cross-situational learning; fMRI; hippocampus.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Algorithms
  • Association Learning / physiology*
  • Female
  • Hippocampus / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Memory / physiology*
  • Pattern Recognition, Visual / physiology*
  • Reward*
  • Verbal Learning / physiology*