U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_152594.3(SPRED1):c.1192G>A (p.Asp398Asn) AND not specified

Germline classification:
Likely benign (1 submission)
Last evaluated:
Oct 26, 2020
Review status:
1 star out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, single submitter
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV001264488.1

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_152594.3(SPRED1):c.1192G>A (p.Asp398Asn)]

NM_152594.3(SPRED1):c.1192G>A (p.Asp398Asn)

Gene:
SPRED1:sprouty related EVH1 domain containing 1 [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
15q14
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_152594.3(SPRED1):c.1192G>A (p.Asp398Asn)
HGVS:
  • NC_000015.10:g.38351521G>A
  • NG_008980.1:g.103671G>A
  • NM_152594.3:c.1192G>AMANE SELECT
  • NP_689807.1:p.Asp398Asn
  • NC_000015.9:g.38643722G>A
  • NM_152594.2:c.1192G>A
Protein change:
D398N
Links:
dbSNP: rs771480941
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs771480941
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_152594.3:c.1192G>A - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
AllHighlyPenetrant
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN169374

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV001442665Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Likely benign
(Oct 26, 2020)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

Citation Link

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Clinical and mutational spectrum of neurofibromatosis type 1-like syndrome.

Messiaen L, Yao S, Brems H, Callens T, Sathienkijkanchai A, Denayer E, Spencer E, Arn P, Babovic-Vuksanovic D, Bay C, Bobele G, Cohen BH, Escobar L, Eunpu D, Grebe T, Greenstein R, Hachen R, Irons M, Kronn D, Lemire E, Leppig K, Lim C, et al.

JAMA. 2009 Nov 18;302(19):2111-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1663. Erratum in: JAMA. 2010 Jun 23;303(24):2477.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
19920235

Details of each submission

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV001442665.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

Variant summary: SPRED1 c.1192G>A (p.Asp398Asn) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00043 in 251248 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0029 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within Latino control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 516 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in SPRED1 causing Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Like Syndrome (Legius Syndrome) phenotype (5.6e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Latino origin. c.1192G>A has been reported in the literature (Messiaen_2009). This report however, does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Like Syndrome (Legius Syndrome). In in vitro cell based assays (Elk-1 reporter assays and PC12 cell line assays), the variant was found to have wild type activity. One ClinVar submitter (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2024