U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_000492.4(CFTR):c.1076A>G (p.Gln359Arg) AND not specified

Germline classification:
Uncertain significance (1 submission)
Last evaluated:
Dec 9, 2019
Review status:
1 star out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, single submitter
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV001194313.1

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_000492.4(CFTR):c.1076A>G (p.Gln359Arg)]

NM_000492.4(CFTR):c.1076A>G (p.Gln359Arg)

Gene:
CFTR:CF transmembrane conductance regulator [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
7q31.2
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_000492.4(CFTR):c.1076A>G (p.Gln359Arg)
HGVS:
  • NC_000007.14:g.117540306A>G
  • NG_016465.4:g.79523A>G
  • NM_000492.4:c.1076A>GMANE SELECT
  • NP_000483.3:p.Gln359Arg
  • NP_000483.3:p.Gln359Arg
  • LRG_663t1:c.1076A>G
  • LRG_663:g.79523A>G
  • LRG_663p1:p.Gln359Arg
  • NC_000007.13:g.117180360A>G
  • NM_000492.3:c.1076A>G
Protein change:
Q359R
Links:
dbSNP: rs397508153
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs397508153
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_000492.4:c.1076A>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
AllHighlyPenetrant
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN169374

Recent activity

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV001363744Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Uncertain significance
(Dec 9, 2019)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (5)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

Citation Link

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Comparison of the CFTR mutation spectrum in three cohorts of patients of Celtic origin from Brittany (France) and Ireland.

Scotet V, Barton DE, Watson JB, Audrézet MP, McDevitt T, McQuaid S, Shortt C, De Braekeleer M, Férec C, Le Maréchal C.

Hum Mutat. 2003 Jul;22(1):105.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
12815607

Next generation diagnostics of cystic fibrosis and CFTR-related disorders by targeted multiplex high-coverage resequencing of CFTR.

Trujillano D, Ramos MD, González J, Tornador C, Sotillo F, Escaramis G, Ossowski S, Armengol L, Casals T, Estivill X.

J Med Genet. 2013 Jul;50(7):455-62. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101602. Epub 2013 May 17.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
23687349
See all PubMed Citations (5)

Details of each submission

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV001363744.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (5)

Description

Variant summary: CFTR c.1076A>G (p.Gln359Arg) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 251008 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1076A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Cystic Fibrosis (Scotet_2003, Zietkiewicz_2014, De Wachter_2017). These data do not allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: May 19, 2024